Anonymous ID: 20d07d Aug. 16, 2018, 5 a.m. No.2625745   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5870

>>2625528

 

The best movie is still only a cheap cartoon of reality.

 

The world has been pulled over our eyes.

 

Do you think the movies that have been pointed out in drops are metaphors?

Or are they evidence in support of the idea that perceived reality has been entrained?

Anonymous ID: 20d07d Aug. 16, 2018, 5:09 a.m. No.2625783   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2625766

 

I was just thinking these things too..

 

Everything is a vibration. Anything that changes that vibration as it pertains to us individually,, will change what we have observed as and labelled "cellular DNA".

Anonymous ID: 20d07d Aug. 16, 2018, 5:16 a.m. No.2625813   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5833

>>2625792

>non-abrahamic religions

 

Guess you haven't been keeping track of the large (and growing) list of high dollar satanic pedophiles that masquerade as [insert religion here] then..

 

Most "religious heads"โ€ฆ Are actually Satanists.

 

I'll give you one more hint: ''satanic'' pedophiles.

Anonymous ID: 20d07d Aug. 16, 2018, 5:29 a.m. No.2625880   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5887 >>5926

>>2625833

 

There's a reason that is happening. And it is on a different vector that "the abrahamic religions" entrainment you've chosen to scrutinize.

 

Does it benefit [them] to create apostasty?

Does it benefit [them] to make people think they have organically discarded God?

 

Is attacking an archetype like attacking a cartoon?

 

Jesus-based religions go back to Egypt and Sumeria. Fuck Abraham.

Anonymous ID: 20d07d Aug. 16, 2018, 5:48 a.m. No.2625983   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6103

>>2625926

>I hate to point out the obvious, but Jesus was a Jew, a very good Jew.

> I don't believe many "Christians" follow the teachings of Christ. Most follow the teachings of Paul.

 

I said it was an archetype, didn't I? It's up to the reader to discern the real message, just like here.

Anonymous ID: 20d07d Aug. 16, 2018, 6:04 a.m. No.2626095   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2626041

 

Hint: once the "money" goes back to actually being backed by something of value.. It will deserve the label of "money".

 

But then hoarding actual money doesn't mean as much ;p

 

Are you against a value backed currency?

Are you against the public having money, instead of the IOU's currently in circulation?

 

"Strong dollar" is a fractional reserve weasel term. Any actual money (ie- it has intrinsic value) is "strong" by default.

Anonymous ID: 20d07d Aug. 16, 2018, 6:13 a.m. No.2626151   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2626126

 

I'm calling it right now.

 

The Fake Media is going to whip themselves up into a frenzy that will look exactly like [they] pulled a page from the playbook clownshills use here.

 

And they will hop on it to the point where even the most brain-dead lobotomized vegetable will get that [they] are chock full of shit, at a cursory glance. ''Just like here.''

 

''And they will do this willingly''

Anonymous ID: 20d07d Aug. 16, 2018, 6:34 a.m. No.2626287   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2626248

>Cry as you notice their incredible staying power.

 

Cryptos are backed by Nothing but belief in their worth, just like FRNs.

 

Cryptos are not the answer.

Hoarding is not the answer.

 

Publicly issued, tangibly backed money is the only way.