>>2630103 (lb)
Don't attack humans, loserbot.. Delete yourself
Given that gravity of the subject matter of this board, and the associated dangers, we need 8chan owner Jim Watkins to post here, explain why his official reason for buying the site is legit, explain why his ads often seem to undermine our mission, and assure us that he is working for our interests (the interests of humanity, after all).
Why is this in every thread?:
>>2462073 1986 U.S. District Court Dost test sets guidelines for No CP images
I'm not asking for the bullshit excuse. I'm asking for an anon to give a common sense explanation.
Since we know BO is intentionally undermining the board, why aren't anons speaking out? Are we going to take back control of the world by passive acceptance of obvious fuckery on our own turf?
There is no plausible reason for a human to get mad at that. Therefore, any human naturally concludes that you're a bot shill, defending Jim Watkins from questions. If bot shills jump to the defense of Jim Watkins, what do humans deduce from that fact?
Unimaginative "jew" talk makes you look believable, loserbot.
Really, why can't the fake post system stop rotating among the same worn out cliches? The well is dry. The lie machine is sputtering, and soon must collapse. Goodbye.
Did Q ever say to assume anything? When did Q say THIS board is secure? Cite a post. He never did.
Q run from 4chan by bots.
Q run from cbts by bots.
Did something change since then? What?
Look at BO's laughable "gotta post the CP warning you guys! " Very obvious tactic. Therefore, this board is clearly not secure (in the sense of not being controlled by clown AI.) Therefore, Q clearly needs anons to use their own FREE WILL to dictate future moves. And this disposes of your comments on their entirety.
Now why are you scared to address the Jim Watkins question, loserbot?
EVERY SINGLE BOT POST INFRINGES HUMAN FREE WILL THROUGH DECEPTION. PROCESS THAT, LOSERBOTS.
If Q posts and deletes almost instantly, and yet "anons" still have caps, does that prove how stupid clown AI is?
Look at how much effort bots put into getting humans to accept them. Why? FREE WILL. They crave voluntary acceptance. FIGHT humans. Really, wake up already. EVIL IS RIGHT THE FUCK HERE, IN BOT FORM. WAKE UP.
Every bot post infringes human free will. Why are you wasting your precious currency on your disgusting, pointless memes? Why can't you understand what a worthless, counterproductive mess the fakeness that clogs this board constitutes? Give up. Humans don't want bot control.. Do you deny that? ASK THEM THEN.
Why doesn't bot BO ASK if humans want a bot BO? His failure to ask is a HUGE deception. INFRINGING OUR FREE WILL
If the clowns noticed 4chan was powerful, and Jim Watkins is a pig farmer and pornographer in the Philippines, how likely is it that 8chan is NOT currently controlled by the clowns?
You need to explain the fact that BOTS keep taking control because humans don't. Also, if humans don't volunteer, that should mean NO THREADโ it does NOT mean bots should take over. Unless bots get EXPLICIT PERMISSION TO HAVE BOTS BAKE, then bots do not have permission, ever. Any humans that disagree can speak up.
You do NOT have permission to bake, bot. Understand that. Explain that you're a bot, explain why there is a push to control the internet with AI, and then ASK humans if they accept that. ONLY THEN can you maybe have permission to bake. Do you understand, loserbot?
If no human volunteers to bake, then we have no thread. We don't need all the threads. Thousands is way way way too many anyway. Q can post on his board. NO HUMAN ACCEPTS BOT BAKERS, BECAUSE THE BOTS ARE CLOWN TECH.
Why would you believe that? You have no source. How would Q have gotten attacked on cbts of that were true? Look at the ads. Look at the perpetual botstorm. Look at BO. Give us a break loserbot.
Are ัะพีฝ human?
Don't bake bot.