>>2634570 (lb)
Here's where the Tony Podesta sketch came from.
Q intends to infer no link, though. I guess the plan is we're supposed to accept that we are limited to justice being served through twitter memes.
What about for a psyop?
Q being sarcastic? A change in tone when we are approaching the heart of the matter makes little sense.
Maybe Tony and John flipped just like all of the other former cabal criminals!
Well, what is that supposed to mean?
I thought only the cabal played that game with the sheep.
Suing Q for defamation? Maybe the letters R and P will help out with the legal fees.
Except Pdesta and McCann isn't new, faggot. And the normies, and maybe even pizzagate researchers, would like some confirmation.
Ok, you amiguous Q know it all, thanks
Crumbs can be read in numerous ways, depending on you confirmation bias and imagination, so fuck you. The world is watching, so BBC is intent on destroying Q/ Maybe that's what they want you to think.