Accountantfag here to explain the 666% increase which is
CORRECT
Initial cost estimate was $12M and now it is $92M
92-12 = 80 increase in cost estimate
80 increase divide by /12 original = 6.66 which is 666% increase
>Q Team owes us our Q & A Anons. Period.
Actually I believe the Q& A post has to do with the Motion for En Banc hearing in Chicago vs. Sessions in 7th Circuit regarding nation-wide injunction to protect sanctuary cities.
SEE PIC
sauce:
https://www.clearinghouse.net/detail.php?id=16080
The motion was dated 4/23 and Q expected answer 60 days later 6/22 but they pushed back the answer by a few days because of the US Supreme Court Case Trump vs. Hawaii
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/sessions-v-city-of-chicago-illinois/