Anonymous ID: 3d886f Aug. 17, 2018, 2:56 a.m. No.2641809   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1834 >>1899 >>1935 >>1999 >>2056 >>2359

Good Morning frens

As I was waking up, I was thinking wishing there was some way we really were going to have a constitutional reset whereby our old govt is cast off. Then I started thinking about questions Q has been asking and what would need to happen in order for us to actually be able to remove the current govt and instill a new one.

So many things were are experiencing currently prove our system of govt is corrupted beyond measure. I thought we needed a checklist of everything necessary for us to be able to legally cast off this failed govt. So far I've come up with these. Any ides on what else might be needed?

 

For a constitutional reset, what needs to happen.

Congress corrupted

Highest LE in the land (DOJ/FBI) corrupted

Secret Courts corrupted - 4A

MSM enemy of the people

Social media platforms silencing free speech - 1A

Election process corrupted

Failure to secure our nation from threats (wall)

 

Any other ideas or am I totally off base with this?

Anonymous ID: 3d886f Aug. 17, 2018, 3:05 a.m. No.2641836   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1906

>>2641834

I know that. It's more of a checklist as to what else needs to take place before it's actually done or will it be done at all?

 

What is the purpose of allowing MSM to go full retard?

Anonymous ID: 3d886f Aug. 17, 2018, 3:33 a.m. No.2641934   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2641899

 

A hard reset is what I am talking about. In 1775, we didn't have the military.

I think you underestimate the amount of Patriots willing to tale up arms.

My whole point is that militia is not necessary with Q/military. They are actively working to cut the real strings and having ready a new govt to replace the old with the new.

Anonymous ID: 3d886f Aug. 17, 2018, 3:43 a.m. No.2641969   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1974

>>2641935

Exactly! Q doesn't keep mentioning a Revolution for no reason. And he doesn't keep pointing out where the current govt is failing to protect the people, especially the children.

 

My whole point was what else would need to occur before it could/should be done.

Anonymous ID: 3d886f Aug. 17, 2018, 5:10 a.m. No.2642330   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2339 >>2354 >>2474 >>2500 >>2538

>>2642229

>Tony Podesta stepped down from his lobbying firm after it was found to be in violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Oct 16, 2017

Not entirely correct. The firm was losing accounts because of the bad publicity. Already losing many clients, he finally agreed to step down officially but he refused to give employees the chance to buy him out and he also refused to use his art collection for a guarantee on a loan.

The woman who started Cogent left and took some accounts with her. After a while, the rest followed her when it became clear they were no longer going to be paid by Podesta.

 

Many of the larger names left Podesta because of Mueller's investigating into Manafort because Manafort was also a client of Podesta. Here's where it gets really interesting.

Manafort was actually working for the Russians n addition to his Ukrain work. Manafort hired the Podesta firm.

Remember, during this time frame that Manafort is being prosecuted for(2010-2014) HRC was SoS.

Podesta personally hired David Adams, a deputy to HRC. John and Tony both were always in close contact with HRC. So here are solid ties to the Uranium1 scandal.

Russia>>Manafort>>Podesta>>Adams>>HRC>>SoS>>WH

Anonymous ID: 3d886f Aug. 17, 2018, 5:25 a.m. No.2642387   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2395

>>2642359

Please don't be scared anon. We have already won this battle. (((They))) just don't know it yet. Potus loves people. He would never agree to anything that would intentionally cause harm. It's really a brilliant plan. It's been a slow plan, but brilliant non the less.

Yeah, it's not just our country but worldwide. That's been a given since the beginning of the SA take down.

As Q says, just relax and enjoy the show.

Anonymous ID: 3d886f Aug. 17, 2018, 5:30 a.m. No.2642412   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2642367

I didn't copy/pasta. Mostly commentary on the dig. I just dig the highlights for the other poster. Will see what I can do again.

 

>>2642369

No, was before Q posted. Mostly anons just arguing, as usual, kek

 

>>2642394

No worries fren. It's all good.

 

Might go to next bread before I'm done.