>>2645691

I am beginning to believe that Payseur is a slide topic.

>>2645792

Anyone with critical thinking skills would understand some basic principles which is not applicable to any one family.

1. Who has immunity from both civil & criminal prosecution?

2. Who has diplomatic immunity?

3. Who pays no taxes whatsoever?

4. Who has no oversight whatsoever?

5. Who has immunity from immigration restrictions?

6. Who has freedom from legal jurisdiction?

7. Who has immunity from arrest, prosecution etc ?

>>2645925

Yes she does which then lead to secret societies.

>>2645925

You as well forgot the Bank of International Settlements.

Even Greenspan enjoys the immunity afforded to state actors.

Thus we now have:

1. The Holy See

2. The Queen

3. The Bank of International Settlements.

>>2645868

No it is not a family.

Look back through Q's posts.

You are glowing.