>>2645406 >>2645525 >>2645670

But, you're all overlooking the FACT that we still need to determine what Q means by [P]. This is important as Q puts P at the top of the power structure. Many think P could be Payseur, so as researchers, don't you think it would be BEST to dig more on P? We may just confirm your "dead ends" but we could maybe find that [P] = Payseur.

As Q-researchers, we really need to dig to the very bottom on this topic. Have bakers considered creating a separate "P" bread / thread?

Let US dig on "P" just like you let us dig on "R".