>>2646446 (lb)

So do you think it is possible that his "protective custody" allows him to testify for a grand jury perhaps?

>>2646548

This was researched EXTENSIVELY back in February. Nothing there.

>>2646632

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/15/us/politics/john-brennan-security-clearance.html

"The White House statement on Mr. Brennan was dated July 26, three days after Ms. Sanders first announced that Mr. Trump was considering revoking his critics’ clearances."

https://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/USWHPO/2018/08/15/file_attachments/1055816/Statement%2Bfrom%2Bthe%2BPresident.pdf

Looks plausible that Q post #1732 may have been referring to Brennans clearance being pulled.