Anonymous ID: 8cb946 Aug. 17, 2018, 1:53 p.m. No.2647498   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Carson HUD will investigate Facebook for housing discrimination

 

The Department of Housing and Urban Development announced Friday that it will investigate Facebook for housing discrimination, saying that the social media giant violated the Fair Housing Act by allowing housing ads that filter out minorities and other protected groups. "When Facebook uses the vast amount of personal data it collects to help advertisers to discriminate, it’s the same as slamming the door in someone’s face," Anna María Farías, HUD’s Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, said in a statement.

 

HUD filed a formal complaint against the company, which will kick off an investigation, on the grounds that it offers advertisers discriminatory options, such as hiding ads from Facebook users who have expressed interests in particular churches or who appear to be parents — or who live in specific zip codes. Facebook also has promoted its housing advertisement business as helping as helping developers find "the perfect homeowners." Following an investigation, HUD, led by Trump appointee Ben Carson, could choose to sue. Fair housing groups filed suit in a federal court against Facebook earlier this year on the grounds that its search options were discriminatory. Facebook did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/economy/carson-hud-will-investigate-facebook-for-housing-discrimination

Anonymous ID: 8cb946 Aug. 17, 2018, 2:03 p.m. No.2647625   🗄️.is 🔗kun

China is trying to spread its censored version of the Internet to other countries

 

The Belt and Road Initiative is China’s flagship program for investment abroad. It aims to connect global markets to China with Chinese infrastructure. Although the bulk of the initiative involves the creation of physical projects, China also has ambitions in cyberspace through the digital Silk Road. That project, which centers on information sharing, has already come under fire, as the network could be used for surveillance and coercion. But as China acts on its internet ambitions abroad, it is working to create more than just infrastructure to connect people to the web, Beijing is also exporting its censored and heavily monitored version of the Internet. This is in stark contrast to the free and open Internet championed by the United States.

 

Chinese President Xi Jinping calls his policy “cyber-sovereignty.” What he means by that is “the right of individual countries to independently choose their own path of cyber development, model of cyber regulation and Internet public polices, and participate in international cyberspace governance on an equal footing.” Put simply, Xi wants to make the rules about what an ever-larger number of the world's inhabitants see online. His preferred version of cyberspace would be an export to other countries creating a system of “national Internets” rather than a single free and open world-wide web that transcends borders. In all likelihood, this would mean that countries that are increasingly economically dependent on China due to investment loans would bend to Beijing’s will on censoring web content, and be content to live behind the Great Firewall.

 

Xi’s alternative cyberspace is likely to look like the one currently available in China. In 2014, Chinese President Xi Jinping kicked off the Cyberspace Administration of China. One of the explicit goals of that new arm of government is to control online content — or put simply to censor things that the ruling Chinese Communist Party objects to. Examples of how these limits play out within China are alarming. Tech companies have been told to freeze websites that hosted discussions on history, the military and international relations, and human rights abuses within China. When companies failed to purge content, they were fined. Individuals, sending private messages on the universally used (in China) app WeChat, have also been arrested for “picking quarrels and provoking trouble,” which is generally understood as a charge of insulting or being overly critical of the government. There exists a blacklist for words, phrases, and images that will be censored automatically without notifying the sender on WeChat. The government has also encouraged self-censorship on the chat platform, threatening punishment for chat “owners” who merely allow unwanted comments under their posts.

 

China has also recently flexed its muscles to push foreign companies to embrace its political narratives if they want to maintain a web presence in China. Already, it has proved successful in bullying airline companies, hotels, and even clothing companies to adopt Beijing’s position on Taiwan. Additionally, Beijing’s stance has affected how U.S. tech companies interact with Chinese cyberspace. Adhering to a call from the Chinese government, Apple stopped hosting Virtual Private Network apps from the Chinese App Store. Leaked plans from Google show that the tech giant is developing a censored version of its popular search service based on Beijing’s requirements.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/china-is-trying-to-spread-its-censored-version-of-the-internet-to-other-countries

Anonymous ID: 8cb946 Aug. 17, 2018, 2:10 p.m. No.2647711   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Report: Trump intrigued by ex-Blackwater chief's Afghanistan strategy

 

President Trump is growing increasingly interested in a proposal from Erik Prince, the former head of Iraq War security firm Blackwater, to replace military personnel in Afghanistan with private contractors, NBC reported Friday. Prince, the brother of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, said the Pentagon's 17 years of armed conflict in Afghanistan since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks haven't yielded a decisive victory partly because military personnel are rotated through the country without spending enough time there to effectively implement winning strategies.

 

Initial efforts in Afghanistan in 2001, with Central Intelligence Agency officers, warplanes and Special Forces personnel, devastated the ruling Taliban in a matter of weeks, he said, and using private contractors who would work side-by-side with Afghan forces on a long-term basis could duplicate that success. Prince's former company, Blackwater, shows the challenge involved, however: Some of its guards were convicted in 2014 of federal charges linked to a September 2007 shooting at Baghdad's Nisur Square that left 14 unarmed civilians dead and more wounded. Prince told NBC that he hasn't spoken with the president directly about his plan, but is planning a media campaign he hopes will convince Trump to embrace it. Blackwater, which the former Navy SEAL founded in 1997, was renamed Xe Services in 2009 and later taken over by private investors who dubbed it Academi. He now leads Frontier Services Group, a Hong Kong-listed security and logistics company. The choice in Afghanistan today is between a conventional plan that Prince says hasn't worked and "a small and unconventional plan that does work," he told NBC's Andrea Mitchell. "Every special forces officer I've talked to, if you ask them honestly, they’ll say that is the approach that works. They might not like my plan specifically, but small and unconventional and living with and working with the Afghans is the only way to do it." Leaving the Pentagon in charge of decisions on the war, Prince said, would mean only continuing conflict. He believes the president's decision to campaign against "endless wars" was correct and says Trump should have stuck with that approach rather than spending $62 billion to increase the U.S. military presence in Afghanistan.

 

White House advisers are worried the the president's growing impatience with the lack of success in Afghanistan will prompt him to take the proposal seriously, NBC said. A National Security Council spokesperson said Friday that no such plan is under consideration. Trump remains committed to finding a political solution that would end the Afghanistan war, White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said earlier this week. "We're exploring all avenues for dialogue in close coordination with the Afghan government, and we’re going to continue to do that," she said.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/business/report-trump-intrigued-by-ex-blackwater-chiefs-afghanistan-strategy

Anonymous ID: 8cb946 Aug. 17, 2018, 2:23 p.m. No.2647865   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7874 >>7889 >>7966 >>8015

Lawsuit: Facebook Misled Advertisers with Inflated Audience Figures

 

A newly filed lawsuit alleges that Facebook misled advertisers by inflating the “potential reach” figures for ad campaigns — the total audience that views ads on the platform.

 

The East Bay Times reports that Facebook is facing a lawsuit which alleges that the website claimed to have far larger audience sizes in U.S. cities and states than it actually does. The lawsuit was filed by Danielle Singer, a Kansas-based aromatherapy fashionwear business owner who claims that the social media Masters of the Universe purposefully inflated it’s “potential reach” figures for a particular advertisement, leading advertisers to invest more money in Facebook’s advertising system believing that they were reaching more users. Singer claims in her lawsuit that Facebook’s potential reach figures for users aged 18-34 in all 50 U.S. states actually exceeded the number of platform users in that demographic. The lawsuit also claims that their suspicions were confirmed by former Facebook employees who described the potential reach figures as “like a made-up PR number. The lawsuit states: “Facebook’s misrepresentation of the Potential Reach of its advertisements induced advertising purchasers, including Plaintiffs, to continue purchasing advertisements, because purchased believed that more people could potentially be reached by their advertisements than possibly could have been.”

 

A Facebook spokesperson told the East Bay Times that: “this suit is without merit and we plan to defend ourselves vigorously.” The lawsuit against Facebook was filed in the U.S. District Court of Northern California and is seeking class-action status to represent all those that purchased advertisements on Facebook from 2013 onwards. The two counts that Facebook was sued on are California’s Unfair Competition Law and a “quasi-contract claim for restitution.” Singer herself spent approximately $14,000 on Facebook ads for her business, Therapy Threads. She then decided to look into Facebook’s potential reach estimations and do her own calculations on advertising reach. What Singer discovered was that in Chicago, for example, there were approximately 808,000 U.S. resident ages between 18 and 34 according to U.S. census data, but Facebook calculated the potential reach for Chicago residents at around 1.9 million.

 

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/08/17/lawsuit-facebook-misled-advertisers-with-inflated-audience-figures/