Pictures are for when you can't get the real thing
Sad
Show us your evidence or STFU.
History shows exactly the opposite - learn to read more and fabricate less
Constantine was the first emperor to stop the persecution of Christians and to legalise Christianity, along with all other religions and cults in the Roman Empire. In February 313, he met with Licinius in Milan and developed the Edict of Milan, which stated that Christians should be allowed to follow their faith without oppression.[214] This removed penalties for professing Christianity, under which many had been martyred previously, and it returned confiscated Church property. The edict protected all religions from persecution, not only Christianity, allowing anyone to worship any deity that they chose. A similar edict had been issued in 311 by Galerius, senior emperor of the Tetrarchy, which granted Christians the right to practise their religion but did not restore any property to them.[215] The Edict of Milan included several clauses which stated that all confiscated churches would be returned, as well as other provisions for previously persecuted Christians. Scholars debate whether Constantine adopted his mother Helena's Christianity in his youth, or whether he adopted it gradually over the course of his life.[216]
Constantine possibly retained the title of pontifex maximus which emperors bore as heads of the ancient Roman religion until Gratian renounced the title.[217][218] According to Christian writers, Constantine was over 40 when he finally declared himself a Christian, making it clear that he owed his successes to the protection of the Christian High God alone.[219] He supported the Church financially, built basilicas, granted privileges to clergy (such as exemption from certain taxes), promoted Christians to high office, and returned property confiscated during the long period of persecution.[220] His most famous building projects include the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and Old Saint Peter's Basilica.
Would that policy also apply to Satanists and pagans?
Ambiguous simplistic messages are like that
You might do a little more to educate yourself.
The Catholic Church were the "only Christians" until the middle ages (Luther 1500ish) where the protestants disagreed on the ceremonial rituals, and "indulgences"
Primarily the primacy of the Pope, although Jesus supposedly assigned the task to Peter.
Like every organized religion since the beginning they have been corrupted by their leaders at one time or another.
The complicating factor is that the Church could only exist in conjunction with the political powers of the day.
At that time it would have been the Holy Roman Emperor and compliant Kings outside the HRE (e.g. England)
Human nature
The late stage Romans and later the Holy Roman Empire, and the Crusades would disagree.
Western Civilization was not created on the basis of Love of Man. The people believe it was their duty to remove heathens, pagans and false competing religions. (e.g. Islam and to a lesser degree, Judaism hence wars and persecutions over millennia .
Deal with the inherent barbarity of man since the beginning of time. No group escaped that reality - ever
You have some childhood experience there that you need to talk about?
If not, I doubt you would have any awareness, since children aren't all to aware of the world around them.
Some stay that way well into adulthood,as can be seen here daily
There weren't any Christian in the Old Testamant, but of course you knew that.
Didn't you?
Please tell us which is the "right one" O' Wise One.
They are all derivatives of the same documents or lore
Lots of interpretations - none perfect
The all come from the same source.
Neo-Marxist revolutionaries
We had lost of them in the 70s
You want a list, see David Horowitz;s Front Page Magazine.
He was once on of their notables (Berkeley-based) who became a hard core conservative.
He was a "red-diaper baby" from the later 40s when his parents (American communists) went underground
After we expose them, what is the next step in "our plan"
Pitchforks and torches or legal procedures?
We gathering any admissible evidence?
Who is gonna do the prosecution?
Board volunteers?
Why don't you take on the responsibility?
This is the 2018 version of "news".
Some self-absorbed journalist telling us about his feelings