>>2648884

Think Omnimax version of Hell

>>2648893

Do you know how many revolutionaries were running around in the 70s (US & Europe),

They thought they had public support then too.

Then they all got jobs in education law and journalism

You want a list of names?

>>2648980

Might be better if you just handled it yourself?

I am sure your feelings are a major priority for him.

Just for fun, look back at the last 5-10 years of your life.

Did you have any plan, and did you follow it?

If you did you wouldn't be so distrustful

He doesn't need your trust, and things will still move forward without "doubters"

Deal with it - you aren't the center of the universe

Enjoy to show or take the complaints to some one who cares

>>2649047

Was that hype in the Book of Enoch or part of the SSP?

>>2649062

Or did you mean worship of the Earth Mother.

Do you speak with the trees & grass?

>>2649106

Key is "honorary:

Fake titles starting from about 1900.

Prestige certificates

>>2649126

So how many are there?

How do you know the details?

>>2649136

I take it you don't believe in circumcision?

You like that "pointy look"

>>2649260

recycled news fro 4 chan that was listed here yesterday

>>2649222

That's what the Hindu vedas & Ascended Masters have been saying for ~2000 years.

I note the those beliefs haven't helped their culture very much in all that time?

>>2649382

We have this thing about courts and evidence.

You have some evidence to share?

Red shoes are legal - now what else do you have?

>>2649329

No one is authorize to speak for others

As a journalist I am sure you understand that.

Who speaks for all journalists?

Who is your leader?

>>2649329

Why not do as you always do and attribute it to a unidentified high level anonymous source?

Wouldn't that be more typical on controversial

issues?

Maybe a quote from Obama's opinion

>>2649473

In the words of that great philosopher Shia L

"You will not divide us"

Try the /skinhead/ chan