>>2655942

The Pakistan connection

We've generally assumed the Awans are Mossad, masking as Pakistan for deniability.

But given the Brennan and Obama background, why wouldn't the Awans simply be their assets, laundered through Pakistan?

Brennan got caught spying on the Senate in 2013, so we know they are ruthless enough to do that.

The Awans have been in the House since 2011 at least… but only in the House the best I can tell.

Did Brennan have to use more direct spying on the Senate Intel committee only because he lacked the same assets he had on the House?

>>2656037

Talking points.

The question is if these where talking points produced by her own office, she technically had the power to declassified her own work product as the originating authority.

>>2656012

Brennan HAS TO STAY in the public eye for his own defense and protection.

He needs to make any charges or arrest look like a political attack against him just for being vocal against the president.

If he slips into obscurity, nobody will care what happens to him.

Plus, he is the last line of defense before this hits Obama directly.

>>2656129

I'm fairly confident that Assange would save the really incriminating items for his own insurance plan and bargaining chip.

I suspect that about the Podesta dump as well.

>>2656270

Then Strzok was Brennan CIA asset to help cover up the email situation that could exposed the broader plot.

While he was there, he also needed to cleanup Uranium One, ties to Obama, and other messes.