-D_CsTBA_YES[AUTH_H7^pZBVTZ7302-]
##FLY##
[OWLS]
HOT-1_pre_D
HOT-2_pre_D
HOT-3+
HOT-4_TERM_AUTHC-TVFCAZD-837392x
HOT-5_pre_D
HOT-6_pre_D
HOT-7_corr_TAXjV^-293Z
HOT-8_pre_D
HOT-9_pre_D
HOT-10_pre_D
HOT-11_pre_D
HOT-12_pre_D
AS THE WORLD TURNS.
HAPPY HUNTING.
P_PERS: WRWY [N1LB][FG&C]
Jeremiah 29:11
Q
I willl preface this by saying that I'm no coding expert, nor am I entirely caught up on the extent to which this particular stringer has been researched. Having trouble following my posts after I post them, so I'll do the best I can to get the ball on something more conclusive rolling.
I think that these stringers, amongst other things, are plug ins for code/excel-based answers and outcomes for potential arguments or logical scenarios. "Boolean Logic" is based on the premise that each value can always be reduced to either TRUE or FALSE because binary always boils down to 1 [YES] and 0 [NO]. Given that we know Q to lump disinformation in, perhaps this is also a tool or clue for us to siphen through what we receive; just one more encryption between our intel and the clowns. Again, not my field of expertise, but perhaps a CyberAnon can chime in and explore this more. Boolean functions are designed to explore "if" "and" "or" scenarios, and given the calculated but mysterious nature of events, both past and unfolding, perhaps this is not only providing us with information Q is aware of, but all the possible outcomes with the sets of data provided. Below is a link to the aforementioned.
https:// www.thoughtco.com/boolean-value-logical-value-3123388