-D_CsTBA_YES[AUTH_H7^pZBVTZ7302-]

##FLY##

[OWLS]

HOT-1_pre_D

HOT-2_pre_D

HOT-3+

HOT-4_TERM_AUTHC-TVFCAZD-837392x

HOT-5_pre_D

HOT-6_pre_D

HOT-7_corr_TAXjV^-293Z

HOT-8_pre_D

HOT-9_pre_D

HOT-10_pre_D

HOT-11_pre_D

HOT-12_pre_D

AS THE WORLD TURNS.

HAPPY HUNTING.

P_PERS: WRWY [N1LB][FG&C]

Jeremiah 29:11

Q

I willl preface this by saying that I'm no coding expert, nor am I entirely caught up on the extent to which this particular stringer has been researched. Having trouble following my posts after I post them, so I'll do the best I can to get the ball on something more conclusive rolling.

I think that these stringers, amongst other things, are plug ins for code/excel-based answers and outcomes for potential arguments or logical scenarios. "Boolean Logic" is based on the premise that each value can always be reduced to either TRUE or FALSE because binary always boils down to 1 [YES] and 0 [NO]. Given that we know Q to lump disinformation in, perhaps this is also a tool or clue for us to siphen through what we receive; just one more encryption between our intel and the clowns. Again, not my field of expertise, but perhaps a CyberAnon can chime in and explore this more. Boolean functions are designed to explore "if" "and" "or" scenarios, and given the calculated but mysterious nature of events, both past and unfolding, perhaps this is not only providing us with information Q is aware of, but all the possible outcomes with the sets of data provided. Below is a link to the aforementioned.

https:// www.thoughtco.com/boolean-value-logical-value-3123388

>>55713

I just got chills reading those names. They were both involved in investigating child sex abuse and trafficking. Has anyone looked into those connections yet?

>>51565

Not only Alice, but notice the two arrows by her feet? One says 11.3 the other 11.5. Both were mentioned in Q drops: I have the posts open on my phone on the old word doc of Q. I don't know how to link it. Archive-Savvy Anons help out?

-11.3 was mentioned on several occasions, at least 4.

10/31:

1) "11.3- Podesta indicted;"

2) "Proof to begin 11.3;"

3) "(once 11.3 verifies as first marker)"

11/1:

4) "On POTUS' order, we have initiated certain fail-safes that shall safeguard the public from the primary fallout which is slated to occur 11.3 upon the arrest announcement of Mr. Podesta"

I can't find the posts with 11.5, could use some help. Maybe there is something clear here we are missing. Follow the journalists, board members, owners, whatever…I'm sure there are some interesting connections to be made with respect to this particular publication.

11.3