dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Just attempting to think outside the box, and look at a stringer a little differently code-wise! Came up with this:

Why are we here?

Why are we providing crumbs?

Think MEMO.

BUILDING THE ARMY.

Not convinced this is spreading?

You, the PEOPLE, have THE POWER.

You, the PEOPLE, just forgot how to PLAY.

TOGETHER you are STRONG.

APART you are weak.

THEY WANT Y OU DIVIDED.

THEY WANT R ACE WARS.

THEY WANT C LASS WARS.

THEY WANT R ELIGIOUS WARS.

THEY WANT P OLITICAL WARS.

THEY WANT Y OU DIVIDED!

LEARN!

FOR GOD & COUNTRY - LEARN!

STAY STRONG.

STAY TOGETHER.

FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT.

This is more important than you can imagine.

Taking the first letter separated from each of these all cap words separated, Q seems to be asking

why “Y RCRP," because he emphasizes by asking again at the lower end, “Y.”

I did a search for RCRP, and found the U.S. Navy program below on acronymfinder.com.

Then I did a search for the U.S. Navy Program for more information, since the first site had no links.

I came up with something pretty interesting, as you’ll see. In a nutshell, it discusses the U.S. Navy’s

readiness for warfare. Maybe more to it, as the company that developed the program named SURVIAC is operated by Booz Allen Hamilton under SURVIAC contract SP0700-03-D-1380.

That is probably worth further digging.

iac.dtic.mil/success_stories/ds/surviac_cost_program.pdf

SURVIAC Success Story

Readiness and Cost Reporting Program iac.dtic.mil/surviac Customer: Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC)

Challenge:

Today’s defense forces operate in a dynamic environment that challenges commanders to balance current readiness demands and emerging requirements with fiscal responsibility. For example, the Navy is heavily engaged across the globe with a 40,000-member force of Navy Expeditionary Sailors encompassing a range of warfighting capabilities. When the Navy consolidated these operations under a single command, Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC), it tasked SURVIAC to design and develop the Readiness and Cost Reporting Program (RCRP) to be used by the Navy to help manage, assess, and report readiness for the warfighting mission.

Approach:

RCRP aggregates unit readiness-related information (including resources of personnel, equipment, supply, training, and ordnance) to determine operational unit readiness status and report to appropriate commanders through a web-based application. SURVIAC provided mission, readiness, and cost analysis and end-to-end system development that enhanced NECC’s ability to achieve cost-efficient readiness, improve warfighting capabilities, and enhance expeditionary force survivability with its unique force structure/requirements. SURVIAC’s multidisciplinary team worked with NECC leadership and subject matter experts to understand the command’s requirements, challenges, and priorities. After almost a year of shaping and developing the concept with NECC stakeholders, SURVIAC delivered a complete operational system that empowers leadership to objectively and quantitatively measure current force readiness and costs. It will also enable commanders – at all levels – to make informed, effective decisions regarding force employment, resource allocation, and investments.

Value:

NECC fully adopted the Readiness and Cost Reporting Program supporting 40,000 personnel aligned under 250 permanent and 150 temporary expeditionary units realizing a $130 million return on investment through cost avoidance, optimized reallocation of assets, and readiness efficiencies. NECC commanders are now equipped with processes, information, tools, and analyses to ensure their diverse expeditionary forces can achieve optimal levels of readiness – with efficient time and cost.

In answer to Q's question, my thought is this program is meant to hold those in Command accountable for their spending, and pin down precisely where the money is being spent. An alternative possibility, this program was intended to hide where money is spent/where it goes, and possibly another slush fund or money laundering operation. I would surmise that, if dirt is found on Booz Allen Hamilton, the company who created it

Note the last drops on the other board.

Think logically.

Refer to past crumbs.

YOU HAVE MORE THAN YOU KNOW.

Do you expect HRC, GS, Hussein, etc to stand in a PUBLIC courtroom w/ potential crooked judges and tainted ‘liberal’ juries?

How do you defuse a bomb?

Knowledge of which wires/strings to cut?

Okay I think I found something from Q’s Friday, 1/26/18 “late drop,” above. I’ve been working on figuring out codes in Q’s messages. I was reversing letters and words, but something just popped out at me on this one. I have been focusing on the words (not abbreviated names) in all CAPS, because I think there’s a reason Q is doing that beyond just emphasizing a point. On this one, I was thinking more about rearranging the order of the words, and this is what struck me, if you take the all cap word “PUBLIC,” and insert it precisely in the middle of the other six ALL CAP words, you get this:

YOU HAVE MORE >PUBLIC< THAN YOU KNOW.

My interpretation is, Q is telling us Anons that we have more of the general public believing in and wanting the same thing that we do, to MAGA! A little (a lot!) positive reinforcement.

Thanks Q!