Anonymous ID: f3dac6 Aug. 18, 2018, 8:06 p.m. No.2662302   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2318

Ok if you take a grid and then define that grid as our 4D reality and rotate it in 3 D so it is seen moving into screen and drop a multidimensional arc and add an axis and hash the part of that drop that can be graphed in 4D. Then rotate it back to the graphed part you get iteration one then do it again two.

Anonymous ID: f3dac6 Aug. 18, 2018, 8:13 p.m. No.2662360   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2662335

NP it is all just geometry.

The original is a square circumscribed by a circle and seeing the connection to e=mc2. The Next are that you can rotate that grid into the screen and drop an arc like Mandelbrot did changing scale and dimension. Then figure the graphical part and rotate back until the graphable part is superimposed on the original grid.

Anonymous ID: f3dac6 Aug. 18, 2018, 8:15 p.m. No.2662385   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2662335

if you were using this to move to distant points in the universe you would want all the angles and calculations.

Basically all I want to show is that there are points and quandrants in our 4D system that may or are distant points in the actual pattern.

Anonymous ID: f3dac6 Aug. 18, 2018, 8:20 p.m. No.2662420   🗄️.is 🔗kun

CERN is the opposite of Nuclear fission it is using huge energy to create objects. Energy is matter and matter is energy. The issue I have is that they are ignoring the underlying factor the pattern that underlies both.

Anonymous ID: f3dac6 Aug. 18, 2018, 8:22 p.m. No.2662434   🗄️.is 🔗kun

To fix their calculations in general they have created dark matter and modified that variable so they can make the math work still ignoring the pattern of the system.