16-year-plan to destroy America,
for those who may be unfamiliar with the evil Satanic plan.
>>2665826 Yes. Yet the board has slowly morphed into something closer to "research AND information." The direction for this was set by Q. Q speaks more directly to us than at first. Less things to puzzle out in Q posts. Speaking to us more like a group sitting at a table. Not an eating table; our relationship with Q Team is not THAT informal. A conference table, with us correctly sitting as subordinates, taking direction from superiors who more often than before use links to guide our attention.
>>2666449 Tried to get someone close to me to read Angels Don't Play This HAARP, by Begich/Manning when it came out in 1997. Loaned them my copy of the book, thinking, "Finally, finally, this individual will see see actual patents and know that I am not nuts." A forlorn hope…the person never read it…far more comfortable in their mind possessed fantasy world. Never got the book back either—they just threw it down somewhere and forgot about it. Nothing has changed—John Q still puts stuff like that in the "too hard" pile and goes back to retard TV.
Yes, the woman seen outside Chelsea's apartment shortly after this incident was the HRC double. Proof is via facial proportions: ratios of fixed landmarks on the face. Sorry I did not keep the sauce.
When people have the blood from their newborn's umbilical cord harvested for use, 10, 20, 30 years later when needed, do you suppose their own blood is really still there in the blood bank? I doubt it! I expect the cord blood is taken immediately and fetal stem cells are harvested from it for medical and scientific use, and given to elites hoping to prolong their sorry miserable useless lives. And then all other biologicals that can be extracted or cultured from the umbilical blood are probably taken. By the time a person wants to exercise their right to their own cord blood, only the bloodbank custodians can say if the offered blood is really theirs or not.
My money is on "not".
Once you are some ways down a certain timeline, there is an identified past event that marks the genesis of that timeline.
Or it could be the event that caused some divergent timelines to reunite or cancel out. These genesis points are not necessarily easily identifiable in advance.
My supposition. Not fact: speculation/hypothesis.
Dub trips have spoken.