indeed
>Can't hide them in tunnels forever.
>Tech is too good.
>Satellites can see the tunnels from space.
>Space Force isn't just for good PR.
Same in UK?
Thousands of UK bridges are 'sub-standard', at risk of collapse and will cost almost ÂŁ1billion to repair, experts warn after the tragedy in Genoa
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6074663/Thousands-UK-bridges-sub-standard-risk-collapse.html
All those street kids in Rio…
Most recent Q drop referenced:
US private prison program rebooted by Trump administration
Jeff Sessions gave the order to revive the justice department’s use of for-profit prisons, a sharply criticized industry that Obama had committed to phasing out.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/feb/23/trump-revives-private-prison-program-doj-obama-administration-end
Recently in the news:
America’s prisoners are going on strike in at least 17 states
https://www.vox.com/2018/8/17/17664048/national-prison-strike-2018
_____
Panic??
The 'But Judges' argument applies much more this election
With 24 confirmations so far, Trump is already setting a record pace in filling up the circuit courts of appeals — Obama only got to appoint 55 circuit court judges in his eight years. And the circuit courts decide the vast majority of the nation’s most controversial cases.
With the Senate’s help, Trump also has the opportunity going forward to fill the 180 current and future vacancies in the lower courts (20 of these are additional circuit court nominations), in addition to the many more seats that will open up as judges retire or pass away during the remainder of his presidency.
Although future presidents will have the same power to appoint and confirm with a simple Senate majority, Trump has a leg up on all of them. Here’s why: Like all Republican presidents, he will appoint judges who are less likely to retire when Democrats are serving as president. But because he is the first president in modern times to fill vacancies at the new, faster rate that the nuclear option allows, he will be effectively Democrat-proofing a larger portion of the judiciary than any of his Republican predecessors could have done.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/the-but-judges-argument-applies-much-more-this-election
fill bread