>>2668395 LB LB LB
lawfag here
i recall when we analyzed the new codes and this provision was a focus
i posted then it would allow the DOJ and Sessions to over see the entire MJ process as well as the civilian criminal courts
that conclusion still stands and I agree with this anon that if the guidance were mandatory it might run afoul of other laws such as jurisdiction, delegation, and who knows what
no sauce or research now but this is my educated guess it was clearly intentional
this link is to the UCMJ amendments not the EO
>We can't beat the credulity of conspiracy theorists with logic
he should have stopped right there
they can only try to win with BULLSHIT
i hear you anon
no one knows for sure
but i trust the plan cuz nothing else makes sense of all the shit that is habbening
nothing
>who were "arrested" on foreign territory by US forces.
lawfag here
i believe this part is NOT required unless you can sauce it
just have to be EC's as i recall and that applies to civilians and US citizens
i also recall some of the UCMJ amendments were in support of that as well
lawfag here
double checked
only requirement to be tried in military court (if not in military) is to be correctly classified as an ENEMY COMBATANT
the definition of this has bounced around a bit between bush and obama admins and court cases but that is what potus will rely upon if they want to bring those charges in mil courts
my guess is if its treason the charges will hold up