dChan
Anonymous ID: 426faa Aug. 19, 2018, 1:57 p.m. No.2669458   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9487 >>9524 >>9571 >>9648 >>9666 >>9687 >>9689

>>2669392 LB LB LB

 

lawfag here

 

Ex Parte Quinn is the bottom line case law cuz it permits trial by military commission of any unlawful combatant against the United States.

 

but it does not answer the question what is an enemy combatant in a definitive way

 

congress passed some laws on this after 9-11 and other rules were tried and changed and dropped

 

your link is one of those

 

bottom line whatever definition POTUS uses will be challenged in court and end up in SCOTUS

 

if treason i believe it will hold up 100%

 

another lawfag weighed in end of LB and posted a good article on the topic

 

>>2669399

>https://www.lawfareblog.com/american-enemy-combatant-case-news-out-dod-and-what-might-happen-next

Anonymous ID: 426faa Aug. 19, 2018, 2:26 p.m. No.2669751   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9843

>>2669648

lawfag here

good analysis anon

however i believe your concern will be allayed by remembering that the law permits alternative and mutually inconsistent theories and laws to be argued in the same case

of course that includes source of authority and all other issues

so DOJ will have no problem arguing that congress has no business butting in and at the same time arguing that whatever congress did supports them too (or is irrelevant etc)

 

i agree with your constitutional analysis but the SCOTUS can still weigh in on the definition of treason - or the exercise of any power granted or limitation imposed under the constitutution

 

that was the early very big cases decided

see

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Anonymous ID: 426faa Aug. 19, 2018, 3:01 p.m. No.2670067   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0131

>>2669871

well it changed since i graduated

i got a JD which was considered the top degree then

DL was then compared like a DO to MD

i also studies for a masters in tax law which was the only higher level at that time

 

if i cared i would dig and see what fuckery the ABA did on this

Anonymous ID: 426faa Aug. 19, 2018, 3:04 p.m. No.2670105   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2669878

>Then you're missing out and you've swallowed the lies

im afraid you are the one doing that anon

 

pauls teachings were not in accord with jesus in many ways

paul created an institution

that is why all his writings became canon

the apostles were weak and failed jesus in many respects

but hes a tough man to follow let alone keep up with

cant be done

paul was the first wellknown anti christ

just read epistle of john and the revelation with that in mind and see it is true