There are some major flaws in the Hitler is a good guy scenario. How is that getting in notables?
I firmly believe that there is a Cabal/Ocult/(them).
I firmly believe Ocult Judiasm/Talmudic/Zionists make up a large aspect of the Cabal, head and direct the Cabal.
Majority of these people that call themselves Jewish at this time, do not genetically trace back to the Israelites, but to the Kazachar (sp) region.
But unless someone can sauce with good sourcing otherwise, from what evidence we have, Germany under Hitler did wholesale remove Jews based on race and without proving involvement in the Cabal. In as much, it appears from personal statements by George Soros a Kazachar Jew, he sided with Hitler.
In addition, George H. W. Bush's father was financially supportive of Hitler. Thus, if Hitler was on the side of right, so are the Bush's and Soros. And not only that, the evidence that Anons dug early on demonstrating the Kazachar Jewish money returned to Germany for rebuilding does not support this theory. Nor can we hold that the OSS was wrong to incorporate the German scientists or intelligence officers into the CIA through project PaperClip. If Hitler's Germany was on the side of justice, the operatives incorporated into the US government were on the side of justice and the deep state that grew out of that union must thus be on the side of justice.
So why would we be fighting ourselves? I don't see the logic in that theory.
I agree with freedom of speech. And believe that untruths cannot stand when exposed to truths. And maybe that is what has occurred with notables. But it seems that statrements should stand up to logic before being elevated to that place.