Anonymous ID: fa2568 Aug. 19, 2018, 10:16 p.m. No.2674980   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5074

>>2674947

Why did you discount Rachel? I don't know what your post is last bread. SHe was #3 in the DOJ at the time, so she would have been most likely outside of Sessions and RR.

Anonymous ID: fa2568 Aug. 19, 2018, 10:36 p.m. No.2675185   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5223 >>5243

>>2675073

look at the name of your pic. It says 3 of 3. I was asking if you had the other 2. No worries if you don't.

 

>>2675074

Don't you remember during RR testimony he said others had signed off on the FISA that had thoroughly reviewed it, so there was no need for him to review it. Only top atty's would have that access. She was directly under him. Q hinted she was a bad apple. To me, what was put down for her title is not a factor. She is an atty and she worked at the DOJ.

 

Regardless of who is on pg 390, what other atty at the DOJ would have been high enough to sign it?

Anonymous ID: fa2568 Aug. 19, 2018, 10:42 p.m. No.2675248   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2675223

Not Lisa Page. We just don't have a clue since we don't even know what dept the person worked in.

Frankly, I'm kind having a hard time thinking that's a signature page. There is no room for a date or a title under the sig line. Could have been a typo by Q.

Anonymous ID: fa2568 Aug. 19, 2018, 11 p.m. No.2675416   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Quick search to see how many times this quote was used. Q's been saying it since January. Not going to get too excited just yet.

 

Coming soon to a theater near you.

Jan 23 - no reference

Apr 4 - Jared Cohen

Apr 15 - Tarmac

Jun 26 - LL/RR/JC/AM emails, texts

Aug 20 - 1st movie