do you have sauce for this timeline?
Why did you discount Rachel? I don't know what your post is last bread. SHe was #3 in the DOJ at the time, so she would have been most likely outside of Sessions and RR.
look at the name of your pic. It says 3 of 3. I was asking if you had the other 2. No worries if you don't.
Don't you remember during RR testimony he said others had signed off on the FISA that had thoroughly reviewed it, so there was no need for him to review it. Only top atty's would have that access. She was directly under him. Q hinted she was a bad apple. To me, what was put down for her title is not a factor. She is an atty and she worked at the DOJ.
Regardless of who is on pg 390, what other atty at the DOJ would have been high enough to sign it?
She didn't sign the FISA
Not Lisa Page. We just don't have a clue since we don't even know what dept the person worked in.
Frankly, I'm kind having a hard time thinking that's a signature page. There is no room for a date or a title under the sig line. Could have been a typo by Q.
well sorry I misunderstood you. I didn't have time to go back and read the bread. Sorry to bother you.
Quick search to see how many times this quote was used. Q's been saying it since January. Not going to get too excited just yet.
Coming soon to a theater near you.
Jan 23 - no reference
Apr 4 - Jared Cohen
Apr 15 - Tarmac
Jun 26 - LL/RR/JC/AM emails, texts
Aug 20 - 1st movie
stupid meme.
it's 100% inaccurate.