Anonymous ID: 6a6289 Aug. 20, 2018, 12:27 a.m. No.2676031   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6040 >>6062 >>6086

the 470 appearing multiple times in the QMAP is notable: it proves beyond any doubt that unless the indictments are the bad guys doing it - then Mueller is definitely good.

 

This whole McCarthyism thing and connecting it to the Witch hunt of today via the Trump tweet means that while in theory, Mueller is good, the QMAP also says he's dirty - how do I reconcile this? Easily: both are true thus he just flipped and is now working for the good guys.

This is tied to why the QMAP so often says "Bigger than you can imagine" because a lot of people we think of as saints may end up just being flipped cultists that decided to do the right thing after a lot of doing the wrong thing (and some being forced to recently)

Anonymous ID: 6a6289 Aug. 20, 2018, 12:33 a.m. No.2676068   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2676054

actually that could be a code so you might not be wrong. I'm srs, well, that's too big a subject to get in here and I wasn't the one who found that article so I'm not going to dig into the potential codes but I do recognize that as a potential one.

Anonymous ID: 6a6289 Aug. 20, 2018, 12:43 a.m. No.2676138   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2676107

you are correct, and Mueller is a ploy of some kind from the getgo as it states as well - there is some kind of master plan that Mueller became the centerpiece of as a flip - and the other assholes that aren't flipped are a tiny number and have no power (as the qMAP also states - it also also states the good guys are in control of Washington -

Anonymous ID: 6a6289 Aug. 20, 2018, 12:48 a.m. No.2676177   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6183 >>6197 >>6258

>>2676117

>>2676111

>>2676103

>>2676099

>>2676062

 

Wow… I get shilled when I tell my story as a victim but this much pushback just for a simple recitation of the numbers on the QMAP? full with talking points of "17 angry dem's" as though I don't know the original context of that and would just nod my head and pretend like it's the same haha : ) ok, I'm over the target now, thank you for letting me know. I suppose that's why our POTUS tweeted that eh? Because the shills are on overdrive to get us to not notice the sky is blue.

Anonymous ID: 6a6289 Aug. 20, 2018, 1:03 a.m. No.2676279   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2676247

Sessions can't approach RR without revealing he knows what he can't know due to being recused - it's all in the QMAP - the reason why we have a stealth Jeff rather than a visible one.

Anonymous ID: 6a6289 Aug. 20, 2018, 1:04 a.m. No.2676292   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6325

>>2676258

I was asked to start my twitter and I wasn't resorting to being a victim - I was making a logical comparison between how I get shilled versus what appeared to be a coordinated shill hit using multiple people including you right now. All with talking points and a methodology of not attacking my fact but creating a narrative just as you are now.

Anonymous ID: 6a6289 Aug. 20, 2018, 1:14 a.m. No.2676357   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6372 >>6386

>>2676325

it explicitly states that Mueller's team is big, not 20-40 but bigger: "think 470" - you can dance around this all you like but it says that.

 

it says 470 is also Huber leading many including me to assume "there are no coincidences" and they are the same fucking thing.

 

As for your coordination - if not then congrats you aren't a shill and I just happened to get hit by multiple people ignoring the content of my post and attacking a shiny object they point to - they just say "I think this points to" and don't justify how it can explicitly state "Think 470" in reference to Mueller and that not be the number it is implying - the only logical reason I can think of for anyone to argue with that is they are trying to confuse people over what is an open and shut logical conclusion.

Anonymous ID: 6a6289 Aug. 20, 2018, 1:23 a.m. No.2676400   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6436

>>2676372

the QMAP points to Pelosi asking for a second special council - the logical conclusion is that she has realized Mueller is not on her side. But I'm not going to argue with you anymore.

 

>>2676386

or you, you just keep repeating yourselves instead of replying to my arguments. So enough is enough.