>>2675597 - lb
Thanks! Just starting to dig on them.
I think that the 470 points more to Huber, not necessarily Mueller. Mueller may be a white hat, or they are just using him as a stalking horse.
By that I mean the following definition:
something used to mask a purpose
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/stalking%20horse
It really doesn't matter what side Mueller is on, does it? Kinda like arguing how many angels fit on the head of a pin, isn't it? Not enough info. to know yet.
Sure could be true. He wants to be a big fish in a small pond, right? Makes sense. Hard to say if he has other reasons as well, though.
I think, and certainly pray, you are right. Make sense as a really good way to give Sessions the necessary room to maneuver.
Yes. Smoke and mirrors. Disinfo necessary to provide room to work. Look other there, when the real action is overy here. It's what makes it hard to really know things, without further info. . The 40,000 foot view.
I see. The most interesting timeline isn't always true, however entertaining the theory might be. Just saying.
I too like to think this way, then try to figure out the most likely way things are actually happening.
It's pathetic when you have to resort to being the victim. Calling anons shills just cause you can't control them is very pathetic as well. It just means you are losing the discussion or arguement.
I am not coordinating anything with anyone. And you sure need to work on your reading comprehension.
Q !CbboFOtcZs 07/01/18 (Sun) 12:11:28 35fcbf (2) No.1986153
>>1986043
Ask yourself - who is filing the indictments?
It would take a very large team to work this quickly.
Who has that kind of manpower?
470
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/
Q
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1985500.html#1986153
Points right to Huber.
Many seem to feel that way today. Not sure it is limited to any one generation.
Muh feelings …… victim status.
Not the way I came up.
Logic isn't your strong suit, is it? I gave you proof, which you ignored, then attacked me personally. You are just a very narrow minded individual. You didn't even read that article that Q linked, it obvious.
Who is the real shill here? Trying to mislead anons.
Pathetic.