Wake up, dude. The Old Testament "God" you're talking about was just Satan in disguise. Of course he demanded blood sacrifice.
Blood sacrifice was NEVER prescribed by the actual God.
The Old Testament should NEVER have been bound together in the same volume as the New Testament and the Protestants are IDIOTS for blindly following the Catholic Church's example in that regard.
Anybody who thinks the King James version of the Bible is the authoritative 'Word of God' needs a lot of redpilling.
a) There was so much fuckery with 'gospels' and 'epistles' at Nicaea and by the King James editors/translators that you can't really be sure Jesus ever said such a thing.
b) Like many if not most statements attributed to Jesus, this alleged statement is ambiguous and open to interpretation.
c) Even if Jesus said such a thing, we have to remember he had to walk a careful line so as not to be killed before it was time. It's logical that he would say things to placate the PTB and thus buy himself time to accomplish his mission.
d) Jesus doesn't really define what the 'old laws' are in that alleged statement. Do they include the Talmudic laws about it being OK to rape Gentile children? How are we to know? Did Jesus want to uphold those laws too? I don't think so.
The real God would never have demanded sacrifices in the first place. Neither sacrifice of animals nor of humans (nor of Jesus for that matter).
The sooner people stop conflating the figure(s) masquerading as God in the OT with the real God, the better.
yes, it's like the story (and complete fabrication) that 'the Jews' were enslaved in Egypt. On the contrary, Jews invaded Egypt, took control over the northern half of its territory (which was the juicy/rich part).
After a couple hundred years, they were kicked out by the natives. Not 'freed from oppression' as the OT says.
There never was such a historical person as 'Moses' (which isn't even a name, properly speaking). And yet, a lot of Christians believe this person existed, received commandments from the real God, etc. Because some crazy fabricated Jewish "Book of Exodus" told them so. A book that was written mainly to whitewash the Jewish invasion of Egypt.
Moses was about as real as Tom Sawyer. His fictional character was an amalgamation of details about the lives of several Near Eastern political and military figures, as is pretty clear to anyone who has looked at the evidence.
Somehow, Charlton Heston is supposed to make the story more believable.
CS = Christopher Steele (in this context)
Does the ">>" have a particular meaning?
I'm guessing that with Q, everything has meaning.
it would really help if Q would start using middle initials too to distinguish people like Schumer and Steele.
I think Steele is a more likely figure to be involved in a texting or emailing exchange with Hussein and the Ohrs.
We've discussed a lot of reasons why the Clintons and other pedovores would focus on Haiti. Obviously, part of it is that Haiti has poor recordkeeping, lots of victims of 'natural disasters' (well, maybe not as natural as they appear), the parents are too poor to protect their kids legally…
But I think another aspect comes from the widespread demon possession in Haiti.
The pedovores like Podesta and Clinton may well think that by ingesting the flesh of demon-possessed people, they are enhancing their own power/knowledge/abilities with that of the demons.
Whereas most of us would hate to become demonically possessed, the fact is that satanists actually strive for this. They love it.