question baker
do you usually put the OP next to the bolded number?
I don't (#3377 for example) but if thats a new format I will, but I saw you didn't for #3381
what do you think?
got it.
I see the point of it: it shows which baker baked the bread (OP), and then who finished it (Notable Bun) when there is a handoff
makes sense, I just haven't done it
carry on baker, thanks
you should just the timestamp of the crumb too
shows it was posted before POTUS' twatt
but its a big crumb so I understand
JWST isn't for looking for just planets, its for actually mostly looking for very early galaxies (before 1 million years after the Big Bang)
it detects in the infrared spectrum and some visible light
it should be great, but they keep delaying it (now 2021)
kek was looking for the reason:
(this one is about pushing it to 2020):
https://spacenews.com/nasa-delays-jwst-launch-to-2020/
(this one is about pushing it back to 2021):
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-44631661
FFS both from 2018 too
Hubble has been amazing for visible light, but this will be amazing for infrared (seeing though dust and other shit)
Q has cited reddit 10 times in 1930 crumbs
Q has cited reddit in .5% of crumbs (though most are recent)
to compare, Q has cited NYT 14 times, thats in .7% of crumbs
NOT ENDORSING EITHER, info is info
>You twatter and Reddit division anons
what the fuck is that???
I don't use either, reread crumbs, they're both comped like half is
planefags
if I wanted to see if an osprey just passed me, which site would I use????
because I swear I just saw one
it was flying really low, so I think it landed by now
it was cool as fuck, never seen one that close before, only seen one fly a few other times