I can bake a couple.
If I remember correctly you have to get the signature of someone very senior in the executive branch (FBI/DNI/WH, etc.). There are only a handful of people that fit that description so it's better just to include all of their names. Stops someone from putting a name that doesn't have the required authority.
Not bad anon. Usually people recommend notables for the current bread. Since I didn't bake last one I don't want to make changes to the previous baker's notables.
To nominate something as notable reply to the notable post saying "baker notable" or something to that effect. If you want to save the baker some effort you can do it in this format:
>>2680660 Anon suggests notables for the baker.
#3384
>>2680415 Military police deploy for duty at Gitmo.
>>2680420 Boente a White Hat? Trust Wray.
>>2680424 More badges of honor.
>>2680755 Clinton State Department contract kickbacks for Halper (plant) and Chelsea's friend.
>>2680960 Robert Mueller let a prolific child porn collector walk free.
>>2681007 Brennan threatens to sue for security clearance.
>>2681005 Anon lists the MOS categories of the MPs headed to Gitmo.
The Indiana Man one does look notable. Next bread is already baked but I can include in the new dough.