>>2687332

I've got a simple if/then set of questions that make discernment of notable posts easier:

Is the post relevant MAGA?

Is the post relevant to a Q drop?

If no, not notable; if yes, then:

Does the post quote from a source?

If no, not notable; if yes, then:

''Is the source of the source bullshit, or is it legitimate valid source?''

If bullshit, then not notable; If legitimate, then ''DINGDINGDING'' you have a notable post. The most important part of this process is checking that the source quoted by any article or report is actually valid.

>>2687363

I don't think it's dawned on "them" that the real reason [they] want the statues gone has ''nothing to do with slavery,and ''everything to do with the fact that the Civil War was about States' rights vs Federal hegemony.

And part of breaking the USA has been directly tied to a state's sovereignty:

Part of this is blurring the definition of what a "state" even is; There's a reason why [they] harp on about democracy, and say nothing ''at all'' about republics. [They] want people to forget that a "state in the union" is no different than any other nation-state, save for being united with the other 49 through the Constitution.

The Act of 1871 at the conclusion of the Civil War, and then the 1913 fed reserve act/irs act changed all that.

Because after those three peices of legislation came. ''WE ALL BECAME FUCKING SLAVES''. Fooling the niggers into thinking it was just them was the icing on the cake. We've all been niggers since 1871.

The Confederate flag is a war flag. The guy who is most associated with it (Robert E. Lee) was against slavery.

He was also pro- states rights ;p