Yeah I saw that so I stopped digging. Kek
Google even summarised it in the search results so I didn't have to click on the link.
Is it recent? I assumed it was old, they don't date their articles as far as I can see (mobile anyway).
Here's the archive link.
https://archive.is/grpZ4
Me neither, just went to archive it in case they want to change their mind at some stage…
There's a bit of a difference with 8ch though. It's quite cleverly designed to be mostly uncensorable. The only things that will get "censored" are things that are demonstrable illegal (or near enough in the cases of CP).
The other sites for widespread discussion are owned by agenda pushers so they can censor free thought with the click of button or a clever algorithm.
The reason they have to do that is because their position is either indefensible to start with, or they lack the capacity to debate effectively for a position they are trying to push forward.
Shills here can try and flood the bread, put up any arguments they want because at the end of the day they can't actually censor opposing views. And if the opposing views are reasoned, logical, and provable then all their arguments are for nothing. The truth will out, as they say.
That's why I'll never waste my energy trying to debate or share anything remotely important or significant on any other board/forum/Chan etc.
Oh and notables don't matter that much to me tbh, they're a convenience. They don't have to be true, and if something gets missed it will no doubt come up again.
Did you not hear Sessions' speech to The Federalist Society?
It was positively dripping with hints that what is going on here matches what is happening with the swamp draining process.
People impatient-so is he, but there's a process… The DOJ "will not" not make decisions based on politics etc. All of that alluding to all of the issues identified here.
Q has lead us to an understanding or at least awareness of all of these issues, and they are very real. So as far as that goes I follow along and enjoy the show.
I am pretty sure Q is not Nostradamus, so I'm not going to get hung up on timelines. Also I think if you checked, Q is fairly general about any time table, which you can take any way you want I suppose.
Oh, and I did NOT hear Sessions say "trust the plan" kek
Fair enough. I just agree that there doesn't need to be any formal system for notables.
Ultimately it's up to baker. Their authority to control notables is inversely proportional to their remuneration.