Did a Shadowy Conspiracy Involve ‘Purging’ the Internet of Records Relating to Lisa Barsoomian?
A conspiracy theory fomented by Roger Stone gets even basic facts wrong.
www.snopes.com/fact-check/lisa-barsoomian-rod-rosenstein/
Did a Shadowy Conspiracy Involve ‘Purging’ the Internet of Records Relating to Lisa Barsoomian?
A conspiracy theory fomented by Roger Stone gets even basic facts wrong.
www.snopes.com/fact-check/lisa-barsoomian-rod-rosenstein/
>Snopes already responding to Q's post (which is actually Reddit's post, and then actually actually Q research post)
Not the sequence of information or what Snopes actually said
They have one thing right - the documents aren't purged
I am looking through some of them now to see if any are worth posting
>Consider the source? How likely is anything snopes says to be accurate?
Read the information and decide for yourself
The story originated with Roger Stone and Big League Politics
I am going thru what Snopes claimed and have not found one error yet
I actually thought Q might be running them now
If I find an error by Snopes regarding this, I will post it
Everything is checking out as legit so far tho
>>2686867 >>>2686686, >>2686734 Lisa Bars "fact-checked" by Soros Snopes. Not true. So we know it is true
=ANONS here is but one grouping of documents/ information that was supposedly purged from the internet==
Still pulling the rest
But the Baker would have you believe what it wants as a heading as opposed to FACTS
>Three breads in a row, an anon has said my label does not match the link
I don't know what you posted or saw, but I am finding info regarding the case.
Anons duly note the Bakers response to providing factual information to their delusions
Also see Bakers admitted refusal to properly identify information based on their feelings
Baker has me and the other anon it responded to confused
Completely Psychotic
>2686911
Rod Rosenstein’s Clinton Connection
www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2018/03/20/rod-rosensteins-clinton-connection/
Rush Limbaugh discussing "purged from the internet case" and RR being a Whitewater Prosecutor
Naw, lets just leave your misleading "clickbait" bs in place.
I'll keep posting all the "purged" documents
>Baker won't accept it, which is why I won't be posting any moar digs. Not going to waste time organizing it into digestible format when I can just read it and move on to moar.
That seems to be the goal / control the flow of information only deemed acceptable to one baker
>I am also a researcher and dig. But, I don't bother when late night baker is on.
I'd seen complaints before but never saw the baker in action / now I know why many anons want this baker gone
Anons are waiting for a new baker so they can post the info they h>>2686691
ave been digging on
Yep
But don't miss that RR was a Whitewater Prosecutor
I'll be posting some info on that later after there is a new baker