https://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-walden/the-red-cross-coming-home_b_7653.html

THE BLOG

09/21/2005 12:10 am ET Updated May 25, 2011

The Red Cross Coming Home to Roost: Remember 9/11, Anyone?

By Richard Walden

Americans have a short and forgiving historical memory. Most can remember last year’s Super Bowl champs and World Series winners, but few seem able to remember a $1 billion scandal involving the American Red Cross following 9/11, America’s most disastrous terrorist or military attack on its homeland.

The details are brief. The Red Cross responded to 9/11 by opening a few shelters to which no one came; tried to trace missing persons but were pushed aside when the World Trade Center site was dubbed a crime scene and police and FBI took over identification of missing persons; and, served coffee and donuts to rescue workers at the World Trade Center site only to be accused of charging for them. (It later paid Daniel Bouley, New York’s star chef, to cook for them after the news about charging for coffee was made public.)

The Red Cross’ own 9/11 Liberty Fund indeed shows only $336,000 in US or state government reimbursement for what little it did do as a “first responder,” a designation equal to police, fire and emergency medical service personnel.

Jogging your memory a bit — Red Cross was the flavor of the month following 9/11. Celebrities, corporations and foundations wrote million-dollar checks and performed or sponsored TV and live events ad infinitum; ad campaigns were rewritten as Red Cross appeals; media outlets pushed their name across the airwaves and online. FEMA did not put out a preferred list of agencies helping 9/11 victims, thus precluding groups like Pat Robertson’s Operation Blessing and Rev. Larry Jones’s Feed The Children from infiltrating legitimate lists of agencies as now being done via the White House’s Faith-Based Initiatives Office.

More at link

https://edition.cnn.com/2001/US/11/06/rec.charity.hearing/index.html

Red Cross defends handling of Sept. 11 donations

November 6, 2001 Posted: 9:39 PM EST (0239 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) – Charities swung into action after the September 11 terrorist attacks, raising more than $1 billion. But questions are being raised about where and how and how much of that money is being distributed.

Bearing the brunt Tuesday during a hearing of the House Energy and Commerce Committee's oversight panel was outgoing Red Cross President Dr. Bernadine Healy.

The Red Cross has raised more than $564 million for the Liberty Fund, which was set up in response to the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

While the agency states on its Web site that it is spending more than any other relief agency responding to the terrorist attacks, it has distributed only $154 million.

Healy was hammered by one New York official for the Red Cross' decision to put aside nearly half of the money raised for future needs that may include terrorist attacks.

"I see the Red Cross, which has raised hundreds of millions of dollars that was intended by the donating public to be used for the victims of September 11 – I see those funds being sequestered into long-term plans for an organization," testified New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer.

RED RED 9/11.

Funds raised vs distributed?

Oversight?

7/10 plane crashes are targeted kills.

Those in the know never sleep.

Q

Dec 4 2017 23:01:17 (EST)

Red Cross is corrupt and used as a piggy bank.

Future topic.

Diseases created by families in power (pop control + pharma billions kb).

Think AIDS.

Future topic.

Relevant.

#FLYROTHSFLY#

Q

Were those pallets of cash in Red Cross tubs in that video circling the other day…from 9/11??

https://www.truthorfiction.com/fbi-corruption-decades-in-a-nutshell-commentary-on-clinton-foundation-misleading/

Apr 25, 2018

“FBI Corruption …. Decades in a Nutshell’ Commentary on Clinton Foundation-Misleading!

Summary of eRumor:

A commentary titled “FBI Corruption … Decades in a Nutshell” draws links between the Clinton Foundation, Robert Mueller, James Comes and the ongoing investigation of the Trump campaign.

The Truth:

The “FBI Corruption … Decades in a Nutshell” is at least rooted in truth. But facts and details are intentionally misrepresented to advance of FBI corruption. For that reason, we’re calling the commentary “misleading.”

It’s not clear exactly where the “FBI Corruption … Decades in a Nutshell” commentary came from. One of the earliest versions we could find appeared on April 4 at a discussion forum called Investor Village under the headline “Incest, it’s Incestuous.” Since, different versions have appeared on social media.

“FBI Corruption … Decades in a Nutshell” is a commentary that misrepresents facts to paint a picture of FBI corruption.The commentary opens by claiming that the Clinton Foundation was under investigation from 2001 to 2005. Supposedly, foreign governments had made donations, and the Clinton Foundation failed to declare them. That, the story goes, led to a grand jury investigation led by former FBI Director James Comey.

However, those few opening remarks deviate from the truth. There was an investigation of the Clinton Foundation from 2001 to 2005. The focus wasn’t into contributions made by foreign governments, however. It was about Bill Clinton’s 11th-hour pardon of March Rich, an international businessman who fled the country in 1983 amid charges that he owed $48 million in back taxes. Rich reportedly “steered millions of dollars” to causes championed by the Clintons and fellow Democrats. That led to accusations from an unidentified information that Clinton pardoned Rich in exchange for financial support.

The FBI file on the 2001-2005 Clinton Foundation investigation is available online, but it’s heavily redacted. We do know, however, that the case was referred to the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York sometime in 2004. And here, again, the “FBI Corruption … Decades in a Nutshell” commentary jumps the rails by claiming that James Comey was in charge. James Comey served as the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York from 2002-2003. David N Kelley was in charge at the time. And a November 2004 document in the FBI file indicates that a “declination of prosecution” would be handed down in the “near future.” That means the decision was made nearly two years after Comey left the office:

While some evidence has been obtained to support (a redacted source’s) theory of contributions from Rich in exchange for the pardon, the investigation, at this present time, is expected to receive a declination of prosecution from the Southern District of New York in the near future.

All of those misstatements and misrepresentations appeared in just the first few sentences of the “FBI Corruption … Decades in a Nutshell” commentary. It’s clear that its claims are misleading, and in some cases outright false. We’re not going to bother fact-checking the rest of it. Given that many of the details are rooted in fact but are presented inaccurately, we’re calling this commentary “misleading.”

>>2690135

(contd)

A real example of the eRumor as it has appeared on the Internet:

Collected on: 04/25/2018

FBI Corruption … decades in a nutshell. Guaranteed to go instantly VIRAL…

THIS IS ONE THAT NEEDS TO BE PASSED ON TO THE ENTIRE WORLD !

Just passing this on. You decide.

Is there just a little corruption in DC?

From 2001 to 2005 there was an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation.

A Grand Jury had been empaneled.

Governments from around the world had donated to the “Charity”.

Yet, from 2001 to 2003 none of those “Donations” to the Clinton Foundation was declared.

Hmmm, now you would think that an honest investigator would be able to figure this out.

Guess who took over this investigation in 2002?

Bet you can’t guess.

None other than James Comey.

Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

Guess who was transferred in to the Internal Revenue Service to run the Tax Exemption Branch of the IRS?

Your friend and mine,Lois “Be on The Look Out” (BOLO) Lerner.

Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

It gets better, well not really, but this is all just a series of strange coincidences, right?

Guess who ran the Tax Division inside the Department of Injustice from 2001 to 2005?

None other than the Assistant Attorney General of the United States, Rod Rosenstein.

Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

Guess who was the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation during this timeframe???

I know, it’s a miracle, just a coincidence, just an anomaly in statistics and chances, Robert Mueller.

What do all four casting characters have in common?

They all were briefed and/or were front line investigators into the Clinton Foundation Investigation.

Now that’s just a coincidence, right?

Ok, lets chalk the last one up to mere chance.

Let’s fast forward to 2009.

James Comey leaves the Justice Department to go and cash-in at Lockheed Martin.

Hillary Clinton is running the State Department, on her own personal email server by the way.

The Uranium One “issue” comes to the attention of the Hillary.

Like all good public servants do, you know looking out for America’s best interest, she decides to support the decision and approve the sale of 20% of US Uranium to none other than, the Russians.

Now you would think that this is a fairly straight up deal, except it wasn’t, the People got absolutely nothing out of it.

However, prior to the sales approval, none other than Bill Clinton goes to Moscow, gets paid $500 K for a one hour speech then meets with Vladimir Putin at his home for a few hours.

Ok, no big deal right?

Well, not so fast, the FBI had a mole inside the money laundering and bribery scheme.

Guess who was the FBI Director during this timeframe?

Yep, Robert Mueller.

He even delivered a Uranium Sample to Moscow in 2009.

Guess who was handling that case within the Justice Department out of the US Attorney’s Office in Maryland.

None other than, yup, Rod Rosenstein.

Guess what happened to the informant?

The Department of Justice placed a GAG order on him and threatened to lock him up if he spoke out about it.

>>2690158

(contd)

How does 20% of the most strategic asset of the United States of America end up in Russian hands when the FBI has an informant, a mole providing inside information to the FBI on the criminal enterprise?

Guess what happened soon after the sale was approved?

~145 million dollars in “donations” made their way into the Clinton Foundation from entities directly connected to the Uranium One deal.

Guess who was still at the Internal Revenue Service working the Charitable Division?

None other than, you got it.. Lois Lerner.

Ok, that’s all just another series of coincidences, nothing to see here, right?

Let’s fast forward to 2015.

Due to a series of tragic events in Benghazi and after the 9 “investigations” the House, Senate and at State Department, Trey Gowdy who was running the 10th investigation as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi, discovers that the Hillary ran the State Department on an unclassified, unauthorized, outlaw personal email server.

He also discovered that none of those emails had been turned over when she departed her “Public Service” as Secretary of State which was required by law.

He also discovered that there was Top Secret information contained within her personally archived email.

Sparing you the State Departments cover up, the nostrums they floated, the delay tactics that were employed and the outright lies that were spewed forth from the necks of the Kerry State Department, we shall leave it with this…… they did everything humanly possible to cover for Hillary.

Now this is amazing, guess who became FBI Director in 2013?

Guess who secured 17 no bid contracts for his employer (Lockheed Martin) with the State Department and was rewarded with a six million dollar thank you present when he departed his employer.

None other than our pal, James Comey.

Amazing how all those no-bids just went right through at State, huh?

Now he, of course, is the FBI Director in charge of the “Clinton Email Investigation” (after, of course, his FBI Investigates the Lois Lerner “Matter” at the Internal Revenue Service and, of course, exonerates her).

Nope couldn’t find any crimes there.

Can you guess what happened next?

In April 2016, James Comey drafts an exoneration letter of Hillary Rodham Clinton,meanwhile the DOJ is handing out immunity deals like candy.

They didn’t even convene a Grand Jury.

Like a lightning bolt of statistical impossibility, like a miracle from God himself, like the true “Gangsta” Homey is, James steps out into the cameras of an awaiting press conference on July the 8th of 2016, and exonerates the Hillary from any wrongdoing.

Can you see the pattern?

It goes on and on, Rosenstein becomes Asst. Attorney General, Comey gets fired based upon a letter by Rosenstein, Comey leaks government information to the press, Mueller is assigned to the Russian Investigation sham by Rosenstein to provide cover for decades of malfeasance within the FBI and DOJ and the story continues.

FISA abuse, political espionage….. pick a crime, any crime, chances are…… this group and a few others were deeply involved in it.

All the same players.

All compromised and conflicted.

All working fervently to NOT go to jail themselves.

All connected in one way or another to the Clintons.

They are like battery acid, they corrode and corrupt everything they touch.

How many lives have these two destroyed?

As of this writing, the Clinton Foundation, in its 20+ years of operation of being the largest International Charity Fraud in the history of mankind, has never been audited by the Internal Revenue Service.

Let us not forget that Comey’s brother works for DLA Piper, the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation’s taxes.

__

End

Notice they skip the Barsoomian part.