Anonymous ID: 1b57f9 Aug. 21, 2018, 2:06 p.m. No.2692110   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2129 >>2192 >>2674

Manafort charges

Most of these are for filing false taxes and not declaring overseas accounts.

They big ones are the bank fraud in 2015-2016.

Basically, he said he had $4m in income, when according to records he only had $400k.

 

Which is the problem trying to declare under the table income deposited overseas.

This will link back to Deripaska, who paid him to be a plant on the campaign.

Anonymous ID: 1b57f9 Aug. 21, 2018, 2:31 p.m. No.2692482   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2692391

Catch-22

Would it have been MORE legal to pay these women from campaign funds?

Or Trump needed to pay them directly?

 

I just don't see how a candidate deals with nuisance shake-downs legally/ethically.

Anonymous ID: 1b57f9 Aug. 21, 2018, 2:37 p.m. No.2692593   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2664 >>2666

>>2692466

And/or he conspired with the women on the shakedown, and split the cash.

Then over billed the Trump organization.

 

I'm still confused how its a campaign violation… or how else it was supposed to be handled that would be more legal.

They would have also gotten him if he spent campaign funds on the payouts.

Catch-22