>>2691774

>>2691690

Re: Did James Comey just propose a perjury plea deal with Q?

>So Name(subject)Fag me this:

>Comey rats out Lynch

>Door then wide open to Hussein?

Sorry. I'm a NewFag here and pretty much clueless about Name(Subject)Fagging. But thanks to the generosity of Anons like you I'm learning.

Yes. My thinking is that we will all eventually have to come to grips with the fact that the "NO DEALS" policy must likely be tempered with good thinking regarding the plan for the expeditious conclusion of America’s worst criminal-political scandal in history.

If Comey proposes to cooperate fully with Q in exchange for a plea deal of perjury (up to 5 years but likely serving only 2 to 3 years), if you were Q, would you not agree? With Comey's cooperation and testimony you could help to ensure the public’s easily understood prosecution and conviction of the entire cabal, i.e. Lynch, Hussein, Mueller (if necessary), both Clintons, and at least a dozen more. I'd take that deal if I were Q. But I'm sure a lot of Anons here would disagree.