>>2695909

>>2696081

You are correct. OP anon here… Q posted these images. On 7-mar, Q says "Find @Snowden." Then proceeds to drop these other images that are clearly from the same set and time period, and they are within 15 minute cab ride from one another. It's a hunch, yes. But finding the person is all the pics i think is critical, seen on street or in car or building.

>>2695909

>>2696142

>You can repost if you want more talk about it "Snowden in car Anon".

>>2696197

>>2696142

More evidence that the images are snowden… a map from this spot to the UN sub-office where he applied for asylum in 2013, the year the pics were believed to be taken - 600 meters away.

>>2696286

>The again, the anon with no evidence could be a shill to start a slide.

I'm not a shill, anon. I'm not sliding. I'm investigating something straight off q's notes that he said to look into several times.