Baker
per request, reposting from lb
AMDOCS post fr lb
Related to (2 breads back):
>>2708677
>>2708458
I think the AMDOCS dig is a big one.
answering other Anon call to dig on AMDOCS
It relates to patents.. patent website down today was an article posted by an anon earlier today.. patents brought up by anons in other non-related matters also comes up here
-
(AMDOCS) Israeli company gathering info on our telephone networking.. found court doc between them & Openet Telecom
https://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/15-1180.Opinion.10-28-2016.1.PDF
p. 36 of this court doc includes dissenting opinion referencing Alice Corp. court case. Looked this up & found a Supreme Court doc:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-298_7lh8.pdf
Another doc referencing this court case: https://www.patent213.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2018/04/Alice-Corp.-v.-CLS-Bank-Int%E2%80%99l-134-S.Ct_.-2347-2014.pdf
SCOTUS site on the page: https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/alice-corporation-pty-ltd-v-cls-bank-international/
Interesting opinion following the ruling:
https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/surviving-101-challenges-after-alice-gone-wild/id=52740/
Academic paper on the Alice ruling (about US desire to protect patents):
https://dc.law.utah.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=onlaw
This next article by Carr IV "protecting intellectual property rights in software after Alice" is interesting:
" After Alice, the approach software owners must take towards protection of their intellectual property is in many ways the opposite of the strategy for obtaining patent protection. Instead of trading the disclosure of their intellectual property in a patent for exclusivity for a period of time, software owners must focus on using non-disclosure and secrecy to obtain exclusivity. Maintaining such secrecy while exploiting a software product in the marketplace is difficult, but after Alice, the choice between patenting and secrecy for software owners now falls very clearly on the side of secrecy. "
https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/355938/Patent/Protecting+Intellectual+Property+Rights+in+Software+after+Alice+Corp+v+CLS+Bank
Another critique of the Alice supreme court decision:
https://www.mbhb.com/pubs/xpqPublicationDetail.aspx?xpST=PubDetail&pub=283
Another one:
https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4139&context=mlr
One more: https://www.sughrue.com/files/Publication/68714262-a78f-4713-9471-ecce45839cae/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/53b0d45c-0dbc-4adf-b23a-14999023fac4/90003000LandslideNatalyaDvorson1.pdf
W/o digging deep into these docs, this dig made me think of Robert Mercer & Medallion. Did US govt agencies (perhaps CIA) as a front company (what is Openet Telecom Inc.) decide to get into a fray over the power of owning OUR data? Did the supreme court decision leave our data & intellectual property rights up for grabs? I'll dig into these docs more & test this hypothesis.
The other direction of the AMDOCS dig led me to the Vatican. Will post on that later.