Anonymous ID: dfd6df Aug. 23, 2018, 9:32 a.m. No.2712617   🗄️.is 🔗kun

There used to be a time, not that long ago, when family and community protected its own and stepped up to serve justice when necessary. If a man's child was brutally raped and murdered, a group of men, sometimes led by the sheriff, took up arms and executed swift justice against the enemy. Such an act was called self-preservation, justice, or heroism. When society becomes too "civilized" and complacent, as ours has, bullies, dictators, and criminals rule over good people who have been brainwashed into thinking that toughness and violence is bad. We have handed over our brains and bodies to the "system" and have left the matter of justice up to the system, which is itself violent and corrupt, and in turn we lost some of our humanity. Violence is necessary for survival. Good people almost always wait too long to fight back against evil.

Anonymous ID: dfd6df Aug. 23, 2018, 9:37 a.m. No.2712665   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Jul 26 2018 11:44:26 (EST)

https://1zwchz1jbsr61f1c4mgf0abl-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Gohmert_Mueller_UNMASKED.pdf📁

What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject?

Known beforehand?

Optics.

Think logically.

Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma?

What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]?

Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?

Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if recused?

Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from?

Think logically.

One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.

Who does Huber [directly] report to?

Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC?

Why is this important?

Why did Sessions recuse?

Is the LEFT attacking Sessions?

What advantage(s) exist based on this setup?

POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal?

Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?

When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it?

When POTUS states “it’s happening” do you believe it?

Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking?

LOGICAL THINKING.

Clickbait derails logical thought.

Think for yourself.

Trust yourself.

Mueller investigating POTUS’ Tweets for obstruction?

You have a front row seat.

Enjoy the show.

Q