>>2713570 (lb) Henry Ford discussion

please post your source with your argument next time and save alot of bread and time.

>https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1445822/Ford-used-slave-labour-in-Nazi-German-plants.html

>Why are you so affraid/triggered about digging this topic?

Not afraid/triggered, I want the truth.

What you and the article is saying is different to what I have read.

You/the article are saying that Henry Ford KNOWINGLY gave approval to using slave labor at his European plants once WW2 started (1939?/December1942?)

You also said that his quotes from 1920 about Jews were only said because he was part of the Cabal.

I am not an expert, but I will go and check on the WW2 stuff..

The article itself doesn't give much detail, ie actual dates, quotes. It doesn't even name the book, though that will be easy to find.

There has been a lot written since 2003 and your lone Telegraph article.

I want the truth one way or the other, not hearsay.

Henry Ford discussion

>>2714165

>>2713826

Thank you.

I am tired and I did not see the source that time so I apologize to the anon.

The discussion has been going over at least three breads from memory, and the original claim was that Ford was a Cabal puppet in 1920 (which may be true but was not sourced), and then expanded (again from memory) to his personally agreeing to use slave labor in the plants, with no dates.

I will check on these supplied leads and the original threads to see what is correct.

I am not trying to be a pain, but both claims are important to verify.

Thank you for your heads-up. I appreciate it.