>>2717486

it was an assumption from which the conclusion followed organicaly(?)

>>2717562

sorry forgot (pb)

>>2717573

x is everything. but thinking about it as energy (possibility of work) simplifies wording of the problem and solution

>>2717604

energy is everywhere. energy is everything that exists.

>>2717625

>>2717604

it does not matter what x is, only what it is made out of

>>2717655

but what is energy? energy can be defined as everything? as everything is made out of energy.

>>2717655

>remains constant without input or release.

and input is Free Will. Will to do anything.

>>2717984

but its simple if you acknowledge that Free Will exists.

if you dont believe in Free Will then there is only 1 outcome of events, that depends only on f(x)

and its clear that you being conscious, having the ability to do anything, you're not bound by any rules you would need to follow.

>>2718068

aha yes. i agree, poor wording from me.

if you 'zoom' infinitely far out, everything is 0, its interactions between components that make up everything (0) that matter. and free will can be included into everything or not.

>>2718155

>>2718186

inifinitely far out there is no surroundings that any system could interact with. as soon as you 'zoom' in you observe only a part of everything and not everything. so there is a system and a surroundings, and these two objects can interact.

everything is one, everything is the same, everything is 0 if you 'zoom' infinitely out. in inf.D?