>>2719027
why the hell do we need precedent to enforce existing law?
when did that change?
>>2719027
why the hell do we need precedent to enforce existing law?
when did that change?
what happened to a speedy and just trial by your peers?
Oh wait, (((they))) aren't arrested or detained.
Soo, murder someone, then well, no need to be arrested, for like 20 to 30 years later, specially if other people would be upset cause they really love the criminal.
This makes sense.
Fucking morons.
/rolleyes
Law is law. Law is above the MSM. If it's not, there is no law.
When does "rule of law" supersede all else again…. like it should…???
Maybe someone would respect rule 556 since we can't respect rule of law.