Anonymous ID: b052dc Aug. 24, 2018, 12:56 p.m. No.2725322   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5797

Majority of Clinton Related Emails on Weiner’s Laptop Never Examined

 

By Sara Carter | August 24, 2018 | 3:33 PM EDT

https://saraacarter.com/majority-of-clinton-related-emails-on-weiners-laptop-never-examined/

New evidence suggests that former FBI Director James Comey was incorrect when he told Congress that the bureau had “reviewed all of the communications” from top Clinton aide Huma Abedin on her disgraced husband, Anthony Weiner’s laptop. The communications had been discovered just days before the pivotal 2016 presidential election and forced the FBI to reopen their investigation into the Clinton email scandal.

 

 

Paul Sperry of Real Clear Investigations writes:

 

At the time, many wondered how investigators managed over the course of one week to read the “hundreds of thousands” of emails residing on the machine, which had been a focus of a sex-crimes investigation of Weiner, a former Congressman.

 

Comey later told Congress that “thanks to the wizardry of our technology,” the FBI was able to eliminate the vast majority of messages as “duplicates” of emails they’d previously seen. Tireless agents, he claimed, then worked “night after night after night” to scrutinize the remaining material.

 

But virtually none of his account was true, a growing body of evidence reveals.

 

In fact, a technical glitch prevented FBI technicians from accurately comparing the new emails with the old emails. Only 3,077 of the 694,000 emails were directly reviewed for classified or incriminating information. Three FBI officials completed that work in a single 12-hour spurt the day before Comey again cleared Clinton of criminal charges.

 

More at Link!

Anonymous ID: b052dc Aug. 24, 2018, 1:02 p.m. No.2725366   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5372 >>5388 >>5731

One of the Trump's greatest accomplishments was NK. Why do they do this back and forth drama of….they are denucleurizing…then they are not… then they are etc.

 

Can any anons explain the point of this? I find it unnecessary. Is it to change narratives?

 

I guess what I am getting at is why have this big accomplishment, then put drama out that makes it look like it was not.