I don't trust the plan and am starting to absolutely despise the blind faith dorks here, but admittedly these are extremely good and valid points
no idea, I've never seen it researched properly. All I've seen for evidence is that footnote in the screenshot about the comparison to 2006 or something which could be bogus.
Someone else said that. I said I've never seen concrete evidence as to whether or not that number is normal. All I've seen is that footnote about it being normal for 2006 to have 1000 or something like that. I admit believing that blindly without ever researching it. Have legal professionals actually verified that the 45,000 number is insanely abnormal?
OK thanks for providing some good explanation… and I didn't say they were blank, that's some other moron who said that.