OUTSTANDING.
Considering the Q post on 4 December about BO's AID's video, how does this tie in?
The upshot across multiple posts was that the US government was funding all the nasty stuff that Soros was doing and programs like this were just slush funds that funneled the money in.
Which is why TGE ended it. But that gets played out in the media as "Trump hates people with AIDS" bullshit. So, the question is where the money went. That requires digging.
>If Trump declares martial law (i.e., under the pretext of Antifa problems), it will be to circumvent the corrupt judicial system.
True, but not completely correct. Given the current state of national emergency, the current state of being in a war on terror, etc., all it takes is a declaration of the President to bypass the three letter agencies and that doesn't need to be public. This is (obviously) currently already being done and has been done since he's been president.
If a properly appointed tribunal makes a finding that someone is an "Unlawful Enemy Combatant" then they belong to the military and may be detained to protect the nation. In addition, they may be tried and punished by a military tribunal. See the Military Commissions Act of 2006. Details are in one of the notable posts, "All the Links are in place"
So, there's need to declare martial law to get this done.
That said, consider why is Gitmo being geared up to take about 15k persons? Does that have anything to do with the 13k+ sealed indictments? Think MS13. Unlawful Enemy Combatants. Transported to Gitmo, tried and executed.
Everything is already in place to do this.
Consider the fundamental difference between MS13, which really are Unlawful Enemy Combatants, and the SJW fuckwads of ANTIFA.
Compare ANTIFA to the antiwar protestors of the Vietnam era and then think about Kent State. Can you say "Bad Optics"? Our judicial system is more than capable of dealing with ANTIFA and the MI knows who they are.
As far as handcuffs and blood, this stuff takes time and the situation has to be handled carefully.
Get out of the spreadsheet and go read through the crumbs again without the "answers" because the future proves the past and a bunch of those answers aren't very good due to lack of information.
There's also lots of dual meanings and the problem is the answers on the spreadsheet are locked. As if "We KNOW what it means!" and there's nothing more to add.
Wrong, Q is CONTINUALLY saying to re-read the crumbs.
Don't make the mistake that the Q team is shooting from the hip. This is and has been being scripted for years. Just the method of comms should tell you that.
Q's last post on 01/31 was at 22:42. Check #42 and what's the last line? JUDGEMENT DAY. That post was 01/19.
When Q posted that, all the Congressional Republicans (including VP Pence) were in a secure bunker with the President. Those 'good' who stood chanting USA under the statue of freedom the day before were FREED.
>JUDGMENT DAY.
Q didn't say anything about those who did not stand chanting USA, did he?
I suspect that one day we'll find that TGE went to that bunker and held court. Those 'good' were freed. The others? Perhaps we'll find out later, perhaps that's part of the 60% we don't get to know about. I think they were confronted with the evidence of their guilt, informed that they were now TGE's slaves and there would be penalties for disobedience.
Wouldn't that put a new light on what McStain is doing? Lighting fires to flush out the snakes?
The point is there was no way to know what JUDGMENT DAY meant on the 19th. And what about post #43? Same day, but 13 hours later.
>Remember THIS DAY
Was that the 19th we're supposed to remember, or will it get referenced in the future?
It's complicated.
Not new. The solution is called backups that are locked and review of the later answers that get put in there. Nothing lost that way.
I didn't say you were arrogant, what I said is that a bunch of the locked answers aren't very good. The problem is lots of newfags are thinking "Hey, We have the answer! That's already been figured out!" Given how much the breads have been shitted up, the spreadsheet is the better choice for someone who wants answers NOW. Which is all the newfags here.
>Lastly, since not everyone who watched the SOTU understood what was happening, does the Freedom declared still automatically extend to WE, THE PEOPLE, effective 01/30 as well? A new emancipation proclamation if you will, for Americans who've been blackmailed, threatened and enslaved, valid whether it was understood to be such or not?
What did Q say? What were the qualifiers?
>While standing under the statue of FREEDOM, POTUS FREED those 'good' people who are currently being blackmailed, threatened and enslaved.
>Those who stood chanting USA were FREED.
This can be read as all the 'good' people who are being blackmailed, threatened and enslaved, which includes those who stood chanting USA, or it can mean that he was specifically talking about the 'good' representatives of the people who have been blackmailed, threatened and enslaved.
I tend to think the latter, because the word good was put in closed captions. The implication is the dirty politicians who were dirty because while they were basically good people, they were being blackmailed, threatened and enslaved.
That, for me, was confirmed with JUDGMENT DAY