WAS researching connections, found different topic, one already noted in digs, page def worth being looked into, has what appears many connecting articles/ notables (archived links)

A Nation Deceived - Council on Foreign Relations Sponsorship of Covert Activities at Home and Abroad

• Council on Foreign Relations Plan for Global Governance in 2013

• Myron Fagan’s Illuminati and Council on Foreign Relations

• One World Governance and the Council on Foreign Relations - The CFR's PR Video

• The Council on Foreign Relations - Main File

• The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and The New World Order

• WikiLeaks Exposes how Council on Foreign Relations Controls almost all Mainstream Media

Additional Information

• 2016 Candidates Must Build an 'Integrated' North America - CFR

• Are We Witnessing The Start of A Global Revolution?

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_cfr.htm

The Round-Table Group in the United States became known as the "Council on Foreign Relations". Origin

The CFR is the promotional arm of the Ruling Elite in the United States of America.

Most influential politicians, academics and media personalities are members, and it uses its influence to infiltrate the New World Order into American life. Origin

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)

is also known as Pratt House.

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_cfr.htm

Happy Digging

brings up a good time to ask…. is there an index of sorts so Anons (new) doing digs can check to see if info 'on file' so to speak, before spending time digging info already dug. Also eliminate duplicate info being posted. lightbulb moment another benefit would be newfag easily familiarize themselves rather than digging thru bakes, or Anons absent due to ???? come back and want to quickly catch up whats new specific to their digging preferences.

muh diggin: Bush's NWO

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_nwo72.htm

Fuji v. the State of California provides the most eye-opening position:

The Charter of the United Nations, as a treaty, is paramount to every law of every state in conflict with it. The Charter of the United Nations, upon ratification of the Senate, became supreme law of the land, within Constitutional provision relating to treaties, and every state is required to accept and act upon the Charter according to its plain language, and its unmistakable purpose and intent. United Nations Charter. 59 Stat.1035 et seq.; U.S. Const. art. 6. (Fuji v. State of California, 217P.2d. rehearing denied).7

John Foster Dulles; from 1952 speech

“The treaty-making power is an extraordinary power liable to abuse. Treaties make international law and also they make domestic law. Under our Constitution, treaties become the supreme law of the land. They are indeed more supreme than ordinary laws, for congressional laws are invalid if they do not conform to the Constitution, whereas treaty laws can override the Constitution.

Treaties, for example, can take powers away from the Congress and give them to the Federal Government or to some international body and they can cut across the rights given the people by the Constitutional Bill of Rights.”

Several wise Americans in the 1950s began to fear both the legal power of United Nations-related treaties to supersede the Constitution and the vague authority of the President through the “conduct of foreign affairs” to bind the United States legally by executive agreements requiring no Senate ratification.

https://encyclopedia.densho.org/Fujii_v._California/

might be a better link for info re: Fiji vs Cali.