>We neither need nor condone the use of violence in our work here.
Baker, BO
Methink should be either rad, bold or capital…
Needs to be stressed more bc very important as they try to make us look bad.
Red
Baker, sorry to bother, but feels important to me.
Now the whole thing is bold. Which makes the last anti violence statement appear much weaker compared to breads back.
Could you stress especially the last sentence, please, and give it back the importance it had before.
BOs call for deleting a line that was doubled is fully agred upon by me, but let us not change the meaning.
Red, or capital letters maybe…?
>We neither need nor condone the use of violence in our work here.
Many thanks!
>>2375811
BO, Baker,
Kindly asking again for you to re stress the important anti violence statement in OP.
Lot of eyes here that are not to familiar with anons work and Q RESEARCH(!!) standards. With much shilling and bad Q storys in MSM going on, ANTI VIOLENCE IS AN IMPORTANT STATEMENT.
Anons seem to have felt the same in the past, bc it was posted over and over when shills called for violence.
Please consider another change to not change the meaning of OP.
Thank you for your good work!
We make it RAIN, Q brings the PAIN!
Trusting the plan!