New analysis on Rosenstien signing off on FISA.

Rep. Gaetz asked if Rosenstien HAD EVEN READ the application passed up to him. The answer was no, and in so many words, the reason is because Rosenstien implied his trust and confidence of the ethics in his colleague before him in the process.

Therefore he didn't even read it(whether he really did or he didn't) so he can't be deemed technically complicit.

So I wonder, RR problems? Or RR redemption?

Has RR been on board with the plan all along, only signing to supplement and push the FISA even further into the light? Therefore helping expose it…?

"Would RR still be operating if something wasn't being done behind the scenes to POTUS' liking?

Q"

>>2740737

Of course I could be completely wrong,

>>2740737

>New analysis on Rosenstien signing off on FISA.

>Rep. Gaetz asked if Rosenstien HAD EVEN READ the application passed up to him. The answer was no, and in so many words, the reason is because Rosenstien implied his trust and confidence of the ethics in his colleague before him in the process.

>Therefore he didn't even read it(whether he really did or he didn't) so he can't be deemed technically complicit.

>So I wonder, RR problems? Or RR redemption?

>Has RR been on board with the plan all along, only signing to supplement and push the FISA even further into the light? Therefore helping expose it…?

>"Would RR still be operating if something wasn't being done behind the scenes to POTUS' liking?

>Q"

>

Replying to my own post to add another thought:

RR also signed off on their bullshit FISA to make the Deep State think they're somewhat better protected with RR being there.