>>2740916 (l/b)
>How do women feel empowered by this❓
Happily, some women are beginning to realise that forced separation from their babies is NOT empowerment, it's slavery, and that the love of a good, supportive, protective husband who makes it possible for them to nurture their own children, is a much better way.
It's always puzzled me how women fell for the lie of empowerment through work. The problem is, women now have no choice and are forced to abandon their children to nursery and forced into work.
It's always struck me as ludicrous that a woman could be forced to work in a nursery caring for other people's children but could not afford to stay at home to look after her own children. Of course, the well-paid "elite" get the best of all worlds - they can pay for live-in nannies and poursue careers. It's tyhose at the bottom of the wage ladder whoo suffer most - those who have to earn a living by caring for other people's chuildren in nurseries because they cannot afford to stay at home to care for their own.
Of course, from the perspective of income tax, it makes a lot of sense to force women into taxable work caring for other people's children. Women who look after their own children at home are not paid and cannot be taxed.
As always seems to be the case, it's the love of money that is the root of all evil. The tax-gatherers are laughing all the way to the bank at the inclusion of women in the workforce so that their previously voluntary work became taxable.