>>2741667 (prev)
>The truth claims of the religions you cite are in many respects mutually exclusive and contradictory. So how can they all be correct?
Religions sprung from the same scriptures long ago, the scriptures were not derived from different Religions.
Religions have been twisted by different groups of (((them))) over time to intentionally hide the truth from you. There is but ONE truth. (((They))) do not want you to find it.
It's all around, you must just perceive.
>In essence you are claiming that 'black is white' is a true statement.
I never made that claim, that is a statement that YOU made,
If you were to open your mind and read The Law Of One, you would find that there are both positive and negative orientations that are in fact diametrically opposed. These two groups are oriented in one of two fashions, either Service to Self (neg) or Service to Others (pos).
Both have their characteristics, attributes and lessons to learn (the later being most important). They are fundamentally opposites and both exist in real time. Each are offspring of the I AM. While they each may represent one man, they are one, much the same as two different leafs on a vine are different but yet comprise the same vine. (My analogy, not anybody else's.)
David Wilcock is unfortunately, not the authority on The Law Of One, that he would have you believe. In his younger days, he crossed paths with those at L&L Research and was exposed to much of the material before other people gained any knowledge of it. However, that is but one sidebar of the material he promotes and is not something he has studied for years in spite of his implications to that being the case. I'm glad to see him exposing people to it who may not have otherwise known of it, but I hope if it resonates with them they will pursue it for themselves. If they do, they will see that (much like Religions) he kind of plays his own twist to what it means and how it should be interpreted.
In my view, it speaks for itself and simply needs no interpretation.