>>2742556

meh, not a terrible idea but lots of logistics.

notables already take up so much time and posts and haggling and discussions and complaints, for little reward, getting another section in there? ugh.

some anons have started threads to compile notables. some anons have started parallel boards to repost. some anons have other archive systems for notables. your proposition is yet another: i'd say go see what they are doing first, to see if it does the job you'd want to do, and either join in or do better.

but, off the dough, ideally.

Notables are ok, i don't think it'd be a good thing to take them away or anything, but honestly, i barely use them in the morning to catch up, so not a big fan. Also, I've baked for a while and would often bake still, if it wasn't for the hassle of notable-collecting and negotiating.

So, yeah. If you think it's worth it, you can try, but seeing as there are many attempts already, not sure you wouldn't be doubling previous work.

But, if you do, please don't expect that to be in the bread: it would just multiply the haggling tenfold:

-baker make my notable a valuable i'm super elite!

-BAKER WHY IS DIS A VALUABALE IT GARABABABABAGE

-etc etc etc

>>2742688

>>2742690

>>2742726

-sir we can't find anything wrong to complain about the announcement

-fuck

-wait this channel had something weird right after

-run with it

>>2742653

holyfuckinghell

how corporate and far from the original drive can you get?

even if half of these are actual suicides (which is doubtful) WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU DRAINING YOURSELF WORKING THAT CORPORATE GIG when it's supposed to be a party out in the desert?

these people

>>2742761

glad to have you here but i hope you're a better clockfagger than researcher.

the dough is the top posts of the bread.

in there, are many wonders.

in there, is the answer to your question…

Other Dedicated Research Threads

>>2399939 – Clockwork Qrange #3 & >>2021597 – Clockwork Qrange #2

but, do post here too, sometimes, to keep us general-dwellers updated on the lastest clockfaggotry triumphs (not being sarcastic)

>>2742801

> so it has to be in the bread

No.

You have typical cat-herder good intentions, but you fail to see the negatives and weaknesses inherent in your "solution".

You're also just talking about the idea instead of just DOING IT, and seeing it where it goes from there.

You want a link to your new thread for valuables in the bread? Fine, that can earn its place.

But a whole new section in the bread, which would require a second parallel system of voting and selecting and arguing and yadda yadda yadda?

please no, good God.

>>2742801

also, if you think

>The hivemind has to be guided

you do not understand

>The hivemind

(as a bonus, guess how many ways this "guiding" can be fucked with, or attempted to be fucked with)

>>2742831 i'm trying to tell him… been many things here, among which a baker, but not so much and in good part because of notables and all it entails. Thanks for your service and patience, y'all are better men/bakers than me

>>2742919

>I do agree it will make things even harder for bakers. Have to find a way to ease the load…

other more patient anons have told you repeatedly already: do what you feel you gotta do, but don't expect others to change for you, or to pick up a ball you can't carry far enough to get rolling.

>before i add it to the dough, when i am baking again (soon).

oh, fuck's sake. would you read and understand what others are telling you?

the longer this goes on the slide-ier it's getting.

your answers are not showing much intent for things to "go better" or even proper understanding of board and posting dynamics.

>Like children?

yes, like children.

DEAL WITH IT

>>2742987

>I know that the take on Comey’s ‘hardly gnome’ pic is that he was repeating a pun ‘ hardly know ‘em’.

well, yes, but no one's saying it stops there.

if someone did tell you it stops there, don't believe them.

>>2743100

>The only true counter argument

that you've entertained.

Many others flew right by you, and apparently continue to do so.

You clearly try and bait me into repeating arguments and explanations. No thanks.

re-read.

>>2743167

>Coincidence?

hell na

>We are in control.

oh yeah

>BIG week ahead.

sweeet

>>2743167

>Hands up?

message sent w picture used?

>>2743285

that was a pretty damn good call

>>2743316

except the part where Q called it to the day

“Done in 30.”

[30]

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 440d98 No.1211343 📁

Apr 27 2018 13:30:14 (EST)

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 440d98 No.1211294 📁

Apr 27 2018 13:26:42 (EST)

“Done in 30.”

[30]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/27/house-report-backs-claim-that-fbi-agents-did-not-think-flynn-lied-despite-guilty-plea.html📁

Why would Flynn plead guilty to something untrue?

Define testimony.

Define ‘on record’.

Who knows where the bodies are buried?

Flynn is safe.

Expand your thinking.

Q

>>1211294

What was completed and released today?

Re: Flynn?

“Done in 30.”

Expand.

Q