[m4xr3sdEfault]*******,=,e \_ヾ(ᐖ◞ ) ID: bc5789 Aug. 26, 2018, 3:54 p.m. No.2748144   🗄️.is 🔗kun

zuckbot, load fistbutt into the e0ncannon

 

 

agnar, where the fuck is my burning man ticket

[m4xr3sdEfault]*******,=,e \_ヾ(ᐖ◞ ) ID: bc5789 Aug. 26, 2018, 4:12 p.m. No.2748343   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8344

"watch the water" is a pay to pray for a fish from daggone iirc

also th es tory of the merman

[m4xr3sdEfault]*******,=,e \_ヾ(ᐖ◞ ) ID: bc5789 Aug. 26, 2018, 4:12 p.m. No.2748344   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2748343

The "fish" etymology was accepted in 19th and early 20th century scholarship. This led to the association with the "merman" motif in Assyrian and Phoenician art (e.g. Julius Wellhausen, William Robertson Smith),[citation needed] and with the figure of the Babylonian Oannes (Ὡάννης) mentioned by Berossus (3rd century BC).

 

The first to cast doubt on the "fish" etymology was Schmökel (1928), who suggested that while Dagon was not in origin a "fish god", the association with dâg "fish" among the maritime Canaanites (Phoenicians) would have affected the god's iconography.[9] Fontenrose (1957:278) still suggests that Berossos's Odakon, part man and part fish, was possibly a garbled version of Dagon. Dagon was also equated with Oannes.

 

The association with dāg/dâg 'fish' is made by 11th-century Jewish Bible commentator Rashi.[10] In the 13th century, David Kimhi interpreted the odd sentence in 1 Samuel 5.2–7 that "only Dagon was left to him" to mean "only the form of a fish was left", adding: "It is said that Dagon, from his navel down, had the form of a fish (whence his name, Dagon), and from his navel up, the form of a man, as it is said, his two hands were cut off." The Septuagint text of 1 Samuel 5.2–7 says that both the hands and the head of the image of Dagon were broken off.[11]

[m4xr3sdEfault]*******,=,e \_ヾ(ᐖ◞ ) ID: bc5789 Aug. 26, 2018, 4:20 p.m. No.2748419   🗄️.is 🔗kun

turns out the jesuits were fine with space ham since the deathc ult created so many conflicts with martyrdom