>>2753516

dear BO

once upon a time you and I discussed the effects of bread title and notables

I think the previous few hours have illustrated a point I'd tried to make with you.

Poorly chosen wording can cause big problems.

Poor editorial discretion in notables choices and the labeling of notables have an effect.

I still have no better long term solutions.

I would suggest in cases like this morning a small edit by you or a BV might do wonders in reducing the shill shit slinging sessions that inevitably occur in breads after the provocative titles

>>2753744 (cheKeKed)

I agree that censorship is antithetical to this place.

One major problem is that 'calling out' the baker happens after the fact and the damage is already done

It is a problem that admits no easy solution

boot camp for the mind

develop the critical thinking skills needed or wash out

learn to slog on and ignore irrelevant postings

BAKER

possible notable

>>2753988 Ann Coulter Debunks 5 Lies and Myths about POTUS

>>2754050

yes temporary.

It is amusing

It is enlightening

It is educational

however

It wastes time & bread

It diminishes focus on real issues

It offends and drives off a few newbies not necessarily saying that is bad, as they were the weak ones anyway

the cowards never came, the weak left early, only the strong continue on… a darwinian process if ever there was