>>2753396

Good, thanks. I'm probably the last to realize this,

but it is clear now that the [30][0:28] meant:

Connect this Q post to the one 30 days ago with the timestamp of 28 minutes, as it contains a photo of a noname with hands up and a prediction that may seem impossible but is not coincidence.

>>2743167

>>2287098

Now there will be less time wasted on guesses next time that we see Q use the format [# of days][minute marker]

>>2754577

Maybe Q will confirm whether Anonymous is just another three-letter-agency operation.

https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/ywna4w/anonymous-declared-war-on-trump-and-then-disappeared